|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 9th, 2007, 01:26 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 45
|
Rendering Options
This is probably a simple question but I'm curious. In Vegas is it better to PRE-render a time-line at the best quality before rendering out as a MPG-2 or is there really no difference from straight rendering to MPG-2 from the time-line?
|
May 9th, 2007, 04:30 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Windsor, ON Canada
Posts: 2,770
|
I see no reason to do a pre-render so I render direct to MPEG-2 from the timeline.
If the video is over 80 min., I'll tweak the bitrate to get the most out of it. |
May 9th, 2007, 05:07 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico USA
Posts: 333
|
It depends on which format you use for your pre-renders. If it's DV, then there is going to be a colorspace conversion issue.
DV is 4:1:1 and DVD MPEG2 is 4:2:0, if you render MPEG2 from DV, you end up with 4:1:0. 4:1:0 means that you will only have 12.5% of your original DV chroma resolution left on the DVD. Vegas generates all media and titles at full 4:4:4, so if you render directly from the timeline, all generated media and titles will end up at 4:2:0 on the DVD, although DV media will still take the 4:1:0 hit. That's the long answer, the short answer is render directly from the timeline. John |
May 9th, 2007, 07:47 PM | #4 |
Jubal 28
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 872
|
No reason to do a pre-render.
__________________
www.wrightsvillebeachstudios.com |
May 10th, 2007, 11:44 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 45
|
Thanks to all for the information. The color space conversion makes particular sense.
|
| ||||||
|
|