|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 18th, 2007, 07:22 PM
|
#61 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,961
|
I guess that's why it isn't being done. Has anyone tried it on Vegas 7 with two fast machines over gigabit?
How about using the cineform intermediate codec? Has anyone done a test on Vegas 7 comparing render times with .m2t files and cineform .avi files? |
|
|
|
May 18th, 2007, 09:33 PM
|
#62 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
The viability/value in network rendering is entirely project-dependent. If you've got a short project, network rendering likely won't save you much time. If you have feature length/long form, and are outputting to any intraframe format, then network rendering is a huge timesaver. If your project has heavy compositing, network rendering is a big timesaver.
We only use it for final masters, but there are folks using it for everything they do.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
|
|
|
|
May 19th, 2007, 04:08 AM
|
#63 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bristol, CT (Home of EPSN)
Posts: 1,192
|
Could someone explain what "intraframe" formats are? Does network rendering work if you're going to convert to MPEG2 for DVD?
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
