1920x1080 60i workflow

Chris Harding · July 28th, 2015, 06:09 PM

Hi Steven

What is the 1440x1080 ??? That is the old HDV format and still has a PAR more than one ..Are you putting your project settings in 1920x1080 or in 1440x1080 ..if you are using the latter (which you shouldn't be) then that will mess up any footage that's in normal 1920x1080

HDV was used when HD first came out on MiniDV tape!

Leslie Wand · July 28th, 2015, 07:35 PM

7360x4912?

are you panning / zooming or such like on these pics? if not they're overkill in a hd project.

Chris Harding · July 29th, 2015, 04:52 AM

Ouch! That's a huge file and from a 36mp sensor too ..However despite the size it still has an aspect of 3:3 (1.5 ratio) and you need your stills to be 16:9 (1.777) so I would crop them in your image editor and resize to 1920x1080 if as Leslie says unless you are zooming on the image.

Steven Davis · July 29th, 2015, 01:19 PM

Yeah, the images are the defacto backup of my raw files, so I just have them do double duty of being 'cloud' jpeg backup and then throw them into my video files. But I'll do some more testing. I just thought it may be a Vegas 13 thing since I havn't seen this behavior before.

And yep, the actual raw files cane be between 25 and 30 meg per. The files are huge, but make a big difference in the video with closeups and such.

Colin Rowe · July 29th, 2015, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven Davis

I read somewhere that rendering to the same speed as your original clip will decrease compression times and speed up render.

This means render at the same frame rate that you shot and are editing the project in. Not the bit rate you recorded at

July 28th, 2015, 06:09 PM	#16
Chris Harding Inner Circle Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Perth, Western Australia Posts: 8,441	Re: 1920x1080 60i workflow Hi Steven What is the 1440x1080 ??? That is the old HDV format and still has a PAR more than one ..Are you putting your project settings in 1920x1080 or in 1440x1080 ..if you are using the latter (which you shouldn't be) then that will mess up any footage that's in normal 1920x1080 HDV was used when HD first came out on MiniDV tape!

July 28th, 2015, 07:35 PM	#17
Leslie Wand Trustee Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: upper hunter, australia Posts: 1,410	Re: 1920x1080 60i workflow 7360x4912? are you panning / zooming or such like on these pics? if not they're overkill in a hd project. __________________ www.lesliewand.com.au

July 29th, 2015, 04:52 AM	#18
Chris Harding Inner Circle Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Perth, Western Australia Posts: 8,441	Re: 1920x1080 60i workflow Ouch! That's a huge file and from a 36mp sensor too ..However despite the size it still has an aspect of 3:3 (1.5 ratio) and you need your stills to be 16:9 (1.777) so I would crop them in your image editor and resize to 1920x1080 if as Leslie says unless you are zooming on the image.

July 29th, 2015, 01:19 PM	#19
Steven Davis Inner Circle Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Posts: 3,065	Re: 1920x1080 60i workflow Yeah, the images are the defacto backup of my raw files, so I just have them do double duty of being 'cloud' jpeg backup and then throw them into my video files. But I'll do some more testing. I just thought it may be a Vegas 13 thing since I havn't seen this behavior before. And yep, the actual raw files cane be between 25 and 30 meg per. The files are huge, but make a big difference in the video with closeups and such. __________________ What happens if I push the 'Red' button?