|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 14th, 2005, 11:49 AM | #46 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vulcan
Posts: 1,564
|
with the gearshift proxy, i assume it does the proxy on the fly.
with cf, i'm assuming it's going to take time to convert m2t to cf avi... or does it do that on the fly during capture?
__________________
bow wow wow |
November 14th, 2005, 01:40 PM | #47 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
From the readings on CF converts HDV on the fly meaning HDV is converted while its being captured through Cineform. Correct me if I am wrong. |
|
November 14th, 2005, 01:59 PM | #48 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
Can you put the M2T file directly on the DVD? I wonder if that would work and what the quality would look like...?
__________________
Phil Hamilton hamiltonp@sbcglobal.net Dallas, Texas " I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! ..." |
|
November 14th, 2005, 06:33 PM | #49 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Katoomba NSW Australia
Posts: 635
|
Quote:
Mind you; that's assuming you don't want titles, fades, transitions, colour correction, etc, etc.... Which brings me to the fact that there seems to be some confusion regarding Cineform CFHD implimentation. There is a difference in the process if capturing via Vegas to the timeline, as opposed to capturing via ConnectHD and the HD Link utility. Via HD Link; there is the option to capture directly to CFHD avi, or both CFHD and m2t as well as m2t only. m2t files can also be converted to CFHD after capture using the HD Link utilities conversion facility. As to the process and whether a capture directly to CFHD from the camera via HD Link is superior in quality to one converted in Vegas... all I have to go on is the posts here. I capture to both CFHD and m2t via HD Link. It takes a little longer, but I figure I'll use the CFHD avi's for editing and rendering out my final to whatever destination I intend, and write the m2t clips to Dual Layer DVD for backup. There's no hard and fast workflow that has reared up as the "ultimate" HDV editing path, but we're all agreed that the fewer render processes run on the original feed, the better. |
|
November 15th, 2005, 08:34 AM | #50 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
Now when I do print to HDV tape an M2T file is created that is then used to record back to miniDV in HD format. All fades, title, etc are there. So why could I not use this new M2T file and rename to mpg for the DVD or am I missing something on this?
__________________
Phil Hamilton hamiltonp@sbcglobal.net Dallas, Texas " I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! ..." |
|
November 15th, 2005, 06:17 PM | #51 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Katoomba NSW Australia
Posts: 635
|
Quote:
I had assumed the m2t would have been 'temporary' and would be deleted automatically at the end of the "write to tape" process... Good to hear that it isn't a temp m2t!! |
|
November 15th, 2005, 06:21 PM | #52 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
-Captured HDV footage onto Vegas 6 and placed it on the timeline (m2t) -Rendred to the supplied cineform codec. -Then did a simple fade in and out to the cineform codec. It runs smoothly like editing DV. -Next I replaced the cineform codec back to the original m2t file. I guess this is how its gonna be played guys. You can spend $$ to get the full blown Cineform where you can get the scene detection which V6 don't have for HDV (arrrggghh!!!). Otherwise V6 alone to do HDV is do able. Now for the Vegas Gurus. With this done, since there isn't Blu Ray yet..I want to print to tape. Will Vegas re-render the whole final edited m2t again then print? Thanks guys for all the comments on these boards. For someone who has no computer or video background I am able to do this hobbie that I love. |
|
November 15th, 2005, 11:03 PM | #53 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
Be sure to uncheck the DELETE box otherwise this temp file will be deleted. This file is then used to play directly back to miniDV on your camera. Now you have an archive copy on disk and tape. Woohoo!! phil
__________________
Phil Hamilton hamiltonp@sbcglobal.net Dallas, Texas " I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! ..." |
|
November 15th, 2005, 11:20 PM | #54 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
Phil,
If you edit the DI and are printing back to tape, you should do the PTT from the TIMELINE, not any other render. Then you're not rendering twice. There is no visual loss that occurs in doing this, but there are some minor advantages if you're going to DVD, if you stick with the m2t for rendering. Otherwise, stick with the CineForm file all the way thru til you render for tape archive.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
November 15th, 2005, 11:32 PM | #55 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vulcan
Posts: 1,564
|
thanks FRED!
that was very helpful. i'm able to take the HDV clips from DVI.net and edit them easily with my current system in vegas6 =). thx. DSE, what are those minor advantages of m2t for rendering vs. cf?
__________________
bow wow wow |
November 16th, 2005, 12:59 AM | #56 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
Thanks |
|
November 16th, 2005, 11:55 AM | #57 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
One thing is for sure HD has spoiled me. Even though the HD on the timeline is rendered to SD for DVD and looks really good - you compare it back to HD and you feel disappointed. I have a Sony HDR-HCI and am very pleased with it and the SD DV pictures it produces are absolutely great - but - disappointing compared to HDV. ph
__________________
Phil Hamilton hamiltonp@sbcglobal.net Dallas, Texas " I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! ..." |
|
November 16th, 2005, 12:26 PM | #58 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
I would like to know if their is any quality difference between editing HDV straight onto Vegas using the supplied codec...versus editing HDV using an "outsider" Cineform HD. That will help me decide if I should get the full blown Cineform. |
|
November 25th, 2005, 02:41 PM | #59 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PAL Zone
Posts: 188
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|