|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 12th, 2011, 12:33 PM | #16 |
Jubal 28
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 872
|
Re: Interlace progressive video?
Well, that was the common "understanding." But much like the also-common admonition against mixing wet-lube and dry-lube tapes in a camcorder, there wasn't much real-world backing to it. So, who knows?
__________________
www.wrightsvillebeachstudios.com |
November 12th, 2011, 06:57 PM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: upper hunter, australia
Posts: 1,410
|
Re: Interlace progressive video?
"But much like the also-common admonition against mixing wet-lube and dry-lube tapes in a camcorder, there wasn't much real-world backing to it"
there most certainly WAS real world backing to THAT fact, as i and many of my clients could attest to!
__________________
www.lesliewand.com.au |
November 12th, 2011, 07:14 PM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
Re: Interlace progressive video?
Yeah, David, there certainly was something to the dry wet thing. The thing is very few people knew which tapes were wet or dry, they only guessed most of the time if they even thought about it.
I started out using wet tapes and went to dry and it really f---ed up my camcorder. I sent mine back to the factory to have cleaned up. There are very few wet-type tapes, and the only ones I know of were some high end Panasonics mini-dv tapes that I used initially on a new camera years ago. I was given detailed information by a factory rep, and it pretty much flew in the face of what most people knew/believed about tapes. But we are really getting off topic. I'm been helped by this thread, good stuff here, thanks everyone.
__________________
"The horror of what I saw on the timeline cannot be described." |
| ||||||
|
|