|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 20th, 2010, 09:34 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Spring Valley CA
Posts: 55
|
No DSLR Compatibility with Vegas 10?
So did I misread something or does Vegas 10 still not support HDSLR editing straight to the timeline? Man, this was something I was really hoping for in this version, kind of a bummer really.
|
October 20th, 2010, 10:00 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,498
|
Works well for me. Do u have a problem? A few of us here can scrub native mov freely.
__________________
Firewerkz Films SGP |
October 21st, 2010, 12:35 AM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
I am able to get a pretty clean preview with filters even applied. I think there is an improvement.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
October 21st, 2010, 07:58 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mtl, CDN
Posts: 77
|
Vegas 10 is pretty amazing with Canon DSLR footage!
I even edited footage from my T2i right off the sdhc card with several fx and transitions and rendered it from the same sdhc card. I am really impressed by this upgrade, wasn't expecting much from it before it's lauch and yet, I believe this is the best Vegas upgrade I have seen. Rob |
October 22nd, 2010, 08:48 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 190
|
I edited some footage straight off my 5D Mk II yesterday. Vegas 10 handles it MUCH, MUCH better than it Vegas 9 did. Vegas 9 was basically useless with the 5D's native .mov files. With Vegas 9 I was forced to buy and use NeoScene (which I subsequently upgraded to NeoHD) just to even think about editing my 5D Mk II footage. Now it's still probably optimal to use NeoHD for heavy duty stuff but if you are time crunched and just need to cut some footage together, it's entirely possible to do it directly from the original footage. Knowing what I know now, I would have just skipped 9 and waited on 10.
|
October 22nd, 2010, 10:57 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
I have the same experience as Keith's. I use Cineform because I think it take color correction better, but for quick edits or rushes.... Vegas 10 is far superior to 9.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
October 22nd, 2010, 04:44 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Spring Valley CA
Posts: 55
|
I do not have Vegas 10 yet, but was reading that it does does not natively support DLSR footage, like Premiere does. But if everyone here is using it without any hiccups, man I would love to get my hands on a Vegas 10 :-) Thanks you guys!!!
|
October 22nd, 2010, 05:34 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Windsor, ON Canada
Posts: 2,770
|
Kristian, download the trial and see for yourself.
I guarantee you'll love it :-) |
October 24th, 2010, 07:26 AM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,498
|
Field Report:
I have upgraded to V10 and attempted a same day edit (wedding) in 5hrs. Alienware laptop i5- works ok but scrubbing is a little slow. Some slight hiccups as compared to a cineform render file. The process to transcode might not be much longer than copying the files from the CF card (via USB2.0 car reader) Dell XPS works very well for the same file. The feel is pretty real time like cineform files.
__________________
Firewerkz Films SGP |
October 25th, 2010, 12:58 PM | #10 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 11
|
Just got my hand on V10 pro and played around a bit. Droping 40+ clips at once and no crash. playback and scrolling through was very smooth. Render out some small clip for test and seems good.
I wonder how the coloring will do w/ the native .MOV bc I relied heavily on neoscene for many projects I did past year. |
| ||||||
|
|