Rendering For DVD Architect Question at DVinfo.net

D.J. Ammons · May 9th, 2010, 06:35 PM

I have only completed a half dozen or so projects using Sony Pro 8. The first few projects I shot at 24p with my Sony V1 and when I would go to render it would select the template for "DVD Architect 24p NTSC Widescreen Video Stream"

A few projects ago I stopped acquiring in 24p and went to interlaced to try and avoid some of the jello effect with the CMOS. On my last project it dawned on me I had still been rendering to the 24p template so instead I rendered to just "DVD Architect NTSC Widescreen Video Stream".

The result was an incredible amount of jagged edges in moving scenes. I rerendered several times with the same results. I finally rendered it on the 24p template I used to use and it turned out fine.

Can one of you professional Vegas users explain to me why? Also I had read it was ok to edit in 8 bit then change the setting to 32 bit to render. Is that correct?

Zulqar Cheema · May 10th, 2010, 08:30 AM

I had those jagglies, I found setting the render to BEST in project properties helped resolve it.

D.J. Ammons · May 11th, 2010, 03:01 PM

ZC,

Did using the "best" render setting adversely affect your render time?

Sam Houchins II · May 11th, 2010, 08:13 PM

"Best" dramatically increases render time.
When viewing interlaced video on my flat monitor (inherently progressive), i see lots of "combing" on edges, but when the same video is viewed on an interlaced tv, all is fine.
Could you be experienceing an interlaced/progressive issue?

Zulqar Cheema · May 12th, 2010, 07:26 AM

Strangely it did not, do a small minute section and time it...

D.J. Ammons · May 12th, 2010, 07:45 PM

Sam, the jagged edges were so bad it was not watchable. The end product shoudl be watchable on both progressive scan tv's or interlaced so I went back to rednering 24p widescreen and it worked fine as always.

May 9th, 2010, 06:35 PM	#1
D.J. Ammons Major Player Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Nashville, TN Posts: 506	Rendering For DVD Architect Question I have only completed a half dozen or so projects using Sony Pro 8. The first few projects I shot at 24p with my Sony V1 and when I would go to render it would select the template for "DVD Architect 24p NTSC Widescreen Video Stream" A few projects ago I stopped acquiring in 24p and went to interlaced to try and avoid some of the jello effect with the CMOS. On my last project it dawned on me I had still been rendering to the 24p template so instead I rendered to just "DVD Architect NTSC Widescreen Video Stream". The result was an incredible amount of jagged edges in moving scenes. I rerendered several times with the same results. I finally rendered it on the 24p template I used to use and it turned out fine. Can one of you professional Vegas users explain to me why? Also I had read it was ok to edit in 8 bit then change the setting to 32 bit to render. Is that correct?

May 10th, 2010, 08:30 AM	#2
Zulqar Cheema Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eseex, UK Posts: 45	I had those jagglies, I found setting the render to BEST in project properties helped resolve it.

May 11th, 2010, 03:01 PM	#3
D.J. Ammons Major Player Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Nashville, TN Posts: 506	ZC, Did using the "best" render setting adversely affect your render time?

May 11th, 2010, 08:13 PM	#4
Sam Houchins II Major Player Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Fredericksburg, VA Posts: 282	"Best" dramatically increases render time. When viewing interlaced video on my flat monitor (inherently progressive), i see lots of "combing" on edges, but when the same video is viewed on an interlaced tv, all is fine. Could you be experienceing an interlaced/progressive issue?

May 12th, 2010, 07:26 AM	#5
Zulqar Cheema Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eseex, UK Posts: 45	Strangely it did not, do a small minute section and time it...

May 12th, 2010, 07:45 PM	#6
D.J. Ammons Major Player Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Nashville, TN Posts: 506	Sam, the jagged edges were so bad it was not watchable. The end product shoudl be watchable on both progressive scan tv's or interlaced so I went back to rednering 24p widescreen and it worked fine as always.