|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 1st, 2006, 04:58 AM | #1741 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
yeah its your video overlay driver.. most likely this is an ATI gfx card?? i get this too.. also happens with media player sometimes, and when u resize the frame, u can bringback the image
|
June 1st, 2006, 03:55 PM | #1742 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NY, NYC
Posts: 367
|
Excalibur: How do I get a cut instead of a dissolve?
Subject line pretty much says it all…
In Vegas 6.0: I’m using/trying Excalibur 5.0.3 demo (I own Excalibur 3)… I’ve added cams 1a and 2a to the toolbar, but when I use them (after running multi-cam), I get dissolves instead of clean cuts. How do I set the buttons to cut instead of dissolve? Thanks! PS -- Edward, I wish you well -- speedy recovery! |
June 1st, 2006, 04:53 PM | #1743 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NY, NYC
Posts: 367
|
Duh... 'c' for cut
answered my own question! |
June 1st, 2006, 07:02 PM | #1744 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 337
|
After I have printed to tape, I will use that same file (after a few adjustment on the properties) and go to DVD architect. With the audio being -20db it will sound very faint on dvd architect. What audio levels should I raise the master up to for my destination??
Thanks |
June 1st, 2006, 08:17 PM | #1745 | |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
Quote:
regarding reference scale/dB matching, www.atsc.org, read the whitepaper on levels.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
|
June 1st, 2006, 08:47 PM | #1746 |
Sponsor: JET DV
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 7,953
|
Yep, "A" cameras dissolve "A"fter the marker
"B" cameras dissolve "B"efore the marker "C" cameras "C"ut "D" cameras do a standard "D"issolve centered on the marker I'm sure you'll see that the Multi-cam tools have grown a lot since version 3 and is also now much faster as well. Since you're on Vegas 6, you don't even need to stop playback of the timeline in order to add new camera switches. Plus, you'll see that the tallys also dissolve indicating the length of the dissolve for you (naturally the tallys "cut" when you're using cuts).
__________________
Edward Troxel [SCVU] JETDV Scripts/Scripting Tutorials/Excalibur/Montage Magic/Newsletters |
June 2nd, 2006, 12:23 AM | #1747 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 177
|
A1u Low cut duplicate with Sony vegas?
I have the A1U and like the idea of the low cut filter, but actually like the sound better from having the filter off. I, of course, get extra noise this way. Does Sony V have built in audio filters to adjust for low noises?
Thanks guys |
June 2nd, 2006, 07:13 AM | #1748 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockton, UT
Posts: 5,648
|
I wouldn't call it a "duplicate" but yes, Sony Vegas (and most other NLE's) have a low cut filter. The filter in A1u is passive, meaning it's not intelligently seeking a frequency and its harmonics. Doing the same thing in post is usually quite simple.
__________________
Douglas Spotted Eagle/Spot Author, producer, composer Certified Sony Vegas Trainer http://www.vasst.com |
June 2nd, 2006, 09:46 AM | #1749 |
New Boot
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
|
DVD Architect and PCM rendering
I am rendering a fairly short piece on DVD Architect (about 30 minutes worth of video). Are there any disadvantages of rendering audio using PCM rather than AC3, other than it taking up more disc space given its uncompressed nature. The quality of the audio seems better with PCM and the volumn is quite a bit louder on the DVD.
Can all DVD players handle PCM? What about playback on computer laptops? Thanks. -- Keith |
June 2nd, 2006, 09:51 AM | #1750 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
Audio standards for DVD are either PCM uncompressed, or AC3 Dolby Digital
Elective formats are MPG2 and DTS for a DVD player to carry the dvd logo it MUST be able to play AC3 AND PCM, therefore, u shouldnt have any issues with the compatibility. as for volume levels, the ac3 encoder within vegas is fully customisable and there are many threads on this forum which detail its nuances |
June 2nd, 2006, 10:36 AM | #1751 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 133
|
ParticleIllusion problems
Hi,
I tried asking this elsewhere and am still frustrated; I hope it's a simple error I'm committing.... I'm importing a 720 x 480 10-second clip into ParticleIllusion (PI) as a background, adding my effects (in this case, snow), then removing the background and rendering only the snow as a TGA with alpha channel. In Vegas, I am importing this TGA file as an image sequence and placing it above the desired footage on the timeline--and now it is snowing on my desired footage. Here are the problems: 1) the TGA file sequence has a size of 598x480x32, even though the project settings in PI were set to 720x480. 2) For whatever reason, the snow effect is at least twice as fast as it was in PI. In other words, after rendering it in PI, it is now snowing twice as fast as intended, plus what looked like snow in PI, now looks like square snowflakes; In Vegas, I right click on the PI created file, select properties/and have these settings: attributes: 598x480x32 format: Targa RLE frame rate: 29.970 NTSC field order: none (but I have tried changing it to lower field first with no success) pixel aspect ratio: 0.9091 (NTSC DV) alpha channel: pre-multiplied When I right click the video file/properties/I have these settings: 720x480x24 format: DV field order: lower field first pixel aspect ratio: 0.9091 (ntsc dv) For whatever reason, I'm still getting the special effects (snow) at what looks like twice the speed--maybe even faster than that--from what I created in PI. Yet the frame rates show they are identical. And despite setting my settings for 720x480 in PI and hitting alt +3 before rendering, the size--as you can tell by the properties--is different. Any help greatly appreciated! --Dale |
June 2nd, 2006, 10:55 AM | #1752 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NY, NYC
Posts: 367
|
Yes -- ver 5 looks great. Thanks for the reply -- be well!
|
June 2nd, 2006, 01:40 PM | #1753 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 68
|
Vegas color correction tools
I am wondering, what is the advantage of paying a Co. like DVfilm to do uncompressed color correction on DV files destined for filmout as oppossed to doing it with the Vegas color correction tools. Thanks!!!
|
June 2nd, 2006, 03:00 PM | #1754 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 31
|
Washington Baltimore Vegas User Group (WBVUG) Meeting
Mark your calendars!
The next Washington Baltimore Vegas User Group (WBVUG) meeting will be held on Thursday, June 29th 2006, from 7:00pm - 8:30pm in Washington DC, NW. We currently have reserved an auditorium that seats 100 people so there is plenty of room for everyone. So come on out and meet your fellow Sony Vegas video editors located in the Washington DC, Baltimore MD and Northern VA area! Thanks and we hope to see you there. For information, click here: http://www.oicproductions.net/wbvug.html Mickey Grackin mgrackin@oicproductions.net |
June 3rd, 2006, 01:48 AM | #1755 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,933
|
"Render As..." undoes Track Motion on my clip
I'm trying to make a 256k Windows Media Video file for the internet from some XL1 footage, but first I want to get rid of the infamous black border bars.
I take my clip into Vegas, click the Track Motion... button on the video's track, and increase the dimensions of the clip to "grow" it enough so that the black border bars no longer show. The clip previews correctly. Then I choose "Render As..." WMV, render, sit back and wait. But the rendered WMV file still has the black border bars, as if the Track Motion enlargement was never applied. What am I doing wrong? Thanks for the advice--
__________________
All the best, Robert K S Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | The best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
| ||||||
|
|