|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 16th, 2009, 10:29 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 83
|
Vegas 64 v.s. 32
Has anyone tried the Vegas 9 64 version v.s the 32 version (on a 64bit system of course)?
I'm not sure I see any difference in behavior(eg. CPU utilization, smoothness of HD clips playing,etc.) Thanks, Bill |
August 16th, 2009, 10:33 AM | #2 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Quote:
Ok. Then choose what works best for you.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
|
August 16th, 2009, 10:53 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 83
|
Should I be seeing a difference. Am I missing something? Thanks
|
August 16th, 2009, 11:01 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Depends greatly on your machine, and what you are doing with video. Differences are very obvious on my machines.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
August 16th, 2009, 11:30 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 83
|
What differences do you see?
|
August 16th, 2009, 11:33 AM | #6 |
Sponsor: JET DV
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 7,953
|
I've done photo montages on both the 32 and 64 bit versions. The 64 bit version both handles it better and renders MUCH faster. I'm getting real-time renders on the 64-bit version now. Much better than waiting an hour or two for the same render.
But, it depends on exactly what you're doing. It also depends on what plugins you need. Not all work in the 64-bit version yet.
__________________
Edward Troxel [SCVU] JETDV Scripts/Scripting Tutorials/Excalibur/Montage Magic/Newsletters |
August 16th, 2009, 12:08 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Medford, OR
Posts: 351
|
Yes 64 bit is faster for me for editing.
One thing to be wary of is however is that if you edit in 64 bit and then bring the project into 32bit for plugins like Magic bullet. Do not bring it back into 64 bit or you will lose all of your magic bullet settings. I did this recently and lost a bunch of work. |
August 17th, 2009, 09:07 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 126
|
Interesting that you guys see the 64-bit version render faster. I'm new to Vegas 9 -- I've been using Vegas 5 until now -- and had the same questions about 32 vs 64.
I just rendered the same project with both, and the 32-bit took just over 9 minutes to render, the 64-bit took 13 minutes to render. I don't do the intesive stuff you guys do. Project was just under 6 minutes on the timeline, a bunch of still photos with zoom/pan movement and several Cineform 1080i video clips, all being rendered to 720x480 MPEG2 for regular DVD format, using a 2-pass VBR render. Machine is a i7 920 with 12GB RAM on Vista 64 SP1. The difference I saw was significant enough that I figured the 32 bit must be the faster version. Based on your comments, I'll keep working with both until I see definitively which one works faster for me.
__________________
Brian Kennedy Last edited by Brian Kennedy; August 17th, 2009 at 09:16 PM. Reason: Oops, Vegas 5 not Vegas 6 previously |
August 18th, 2009, 04:54 AM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Well,
I don't use Vista, I don't have an i7, I don't use Cineform, and I don't generally render to Mpeg2. So maybe the 32bit version is faster for those things. I use a dual quadcore, Lagarith/Mpeg4/DNxHD/JP2k on the timeline and as finishing codecs, and I run XP64 on the laptop and Win7 on the editing machine. So Win32 may certainly be faster for what you're doing.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
| ||||||
|
|