August 16th, 2009, 09:24 PM | #46 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
If you and your clients are happy, then no you are not missing anything. However, it is not the goal of everyone to produce faster results, or take shortcuts. Some people strive for excellence. Others don't.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
August 17th, 2009, 12:46 AM | #47 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
vdub resize settings
Can someone share there virtual dub 'resize' and compression settings. While I'm rendering a very nice looking avi. DVDA does not like it at all and is really messing it up. The aspect ratio is off (vertically squished), and has horizontal lines.
The source clip is: 1440x180 (cineform .avi). Vegas project settings: HDV 1080-60i template - Upper field first, blend fields, 8-bit. Note: source footage is mixed hdv and 5d2 (cineform converted via Neoscene) The vdub settings i'm using are: Resize Absolute pixels: (checked) set at 720x480 Relative:(unchecked) 50x44.4444 Aspect Ratio: Disabled Filter Mode: Lanczos3 Interlace: (unchecked) Framing Options: Letterox/crop to size: 720x480 Codec friendly sizing: have tried several - soesn't seem to matter. I have also reloaded the .avi into Vegas. (widescreen project settings) and re-rendered using mpeg2 template and the re-rendered file , and while it looks good, the aspect ratio (vertical squishing) is happening again. Any help would be appreciated. Ken.
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
August 17th, 2009, 05:29 AM | #48 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lipa City Batangas, Philippines
Posts: 1,110
|
Hi Ken. I don't see the Letterbox/Crop to Size setting in my version of Vdub, but I don't think you should be setting anything that says letterbox.
Alternatively, are you setting up a 16:9 project in DVDA? Sounds like it could be your project is 4:3 and the footage is 16:9, hence the letterboxing. Richard |
August 17th, 2009, 06:20 AM | #49 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 99
|
[QUOTE=Jim Snow;1227673]
My conclusion is that most of the “damage” to resolution is when the files are resized when encoding with Main Concepts. The files that I encoded to MPEG-2 after resizing them in VirtualDub were of apparently equal quality when encoded with either the Main Concepts encoder or TMPGEnc. It appears that the culprit that degrades the files is the resizing operation in Main Concepts. If the culprit is the resizing operation in Main Concept would a simple solution be to render your edited HDV footage as uncompressed SD avi in Vegas (ie resize). Then render this avi file to mpeg2 using mainconcept in Vegas. Or am I missing a vital point. |
August 17th, 2009, 07:29 AM | #50 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
Ken, this is what a lot of people on the EDius forum use. The Vdub resize will be the same for Vegas too.
Using Virtual Dub and Edius to downscale HD to SD. My normal approach is to use TMPGenc with Lancsos first and if the results are OK then I am happy if there are problems then I use this Vdub approach. IT takes longer needs some touch up for colour and sharpness but has less artifacts. Most of the time TMPGenc is fine and a lot better than directly out of Vegas or Edius. I output from Edius as a HQ file or Vegas as HDV file and let TMPGenc do the downconvert and encode for SD DVD. Ron Evans |
August 17th, 2009, 09:20 AM | #51 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
Thanks Richard/Ron,
I just ran yet another test in vdub with the resize set to 720x405 (16:9 ratio) using Lagarith compressor - and it renders beautifully. DVDA then prepared and burned it in proper aspect ratio. WTF? I'm going to try another larger file now.
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
August 17th, 2009, 09:41 AM | #52 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 1,104
|
You would still have a resizing problem. The Lanczos3 resizer is important. It does a much better job.
|
August 17th, 2009, 11:49 AM | #53 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
Well, I'm not exactly sure why, but that 720x405 setting works beautifully in DVDA
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
August 17th, 2009, 03:00 PM | #54 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Quote:
Lagarith + Lanczos = Beautiful downscales. The 720x405 works fine for SD. It's a bit tricky for those with 16:9 TVs. 720x480 with the widescreen flag on should work fine for making SD discs and it's what I tend to do these days.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
|
August 17th, 2009, 06:13 PM | #55 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
Perrone and others,
Thanks for all the help! That's the kind of DVD quality I was expecting from an HD-SD conversion.
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
August 18th, 2009, 02:14 AM | #56 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 99
|
Hi,
When rendering the HQ AVI file from Vegas using the Lagarith codec, for importing into Virtualdub, do you set the aspect ratio as 1440:1080 with PAR at 1.333333 (ie same as source) or use custom setting 1920:1080 with PAR square pixels. Apologies if this is a basic question. I don't have Vegas in front of me. |
August 18th, 2009, 04:43 AM | #57 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
I avoid non-square pixels like the plague. They complicate matters more than necessary. Once you get to square pixels everything becomes perfectly simple.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
August 18th, 2009, 05:39 AM | #58 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lipa City Batangas, Philippines
Posts: 1,110
|
Quote:
I certainly would not want to upsize to 1920x1080 just to resize back to SD resolution again. Richard |
|
August 18th, 2009, 06:23 AM | #59 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Very true Richard, very true.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
August 18th, 2009, 01:23 PM | #60 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 703
|
Perrone,
Are you shooting 1080/30p with your EX1 and creating interlaced SD DVDs from that or are you shooting 1080/60i? Thanks, John |
| ||||||
|
|