|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 6th, 2004, 08:53 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 95
|
Rendering takes a very long time
Hello fellow Vegas users:
I'm rendering an hour video with some background music and fade in/out effect but it takes such a long time. I render it as mpeg2 - dvd ntsc and it started rendering about 11 hours ago and according to the status windows, it says I have another 16 hours to go. As of right now, it rendered about 41 %. Is this normal with Vegas? Unlike Pinnacle Studio8 it took about 6 hours to render an hour video. Did I do something wrong? |
March 6th, 2004, 09:03 AM | #2 |
Old Boot
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 3,633
|
Yup! Too much going on at once . .
This is what I do:- 1 - Render as AVI 2- THEN render as MPEG or some other flavour . . . Try this as a test . .You could go over to the Vegas FOrum and sdo a search there for the typica;l render times . .. Yes, Vegas does take a lot of time .. Yoiu need to aquire a different workflow. remeber you can have more than one instance of Vegas open at any on time to allow you to get on with somthing else yeah? Hope this helps .. Grazie |
March 6th, 2004, 09:06 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 95
|
GB
Thanks for your quick reply. I will try AVI right now. |
March 6th, 2004, 08:43 PM | #4 |
Sponsor: JET DV
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 7,953
|
It also depends greatly on what effects/transitions/changes have beeen added/made to the video. For example, simply accidentally bumping the track transparency from 100% to 99% will have no visible difference but will have a dramatic render difference.
|
March 6th, 2004, 09:19 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
for a quicker render, u can also right click on the file within the timeline and "Disable Resample" the will then only do a direct copy of the clip, and only resample the editied elements bing effects, transitions and titles.
make sure whenu select avi, its the wondows avi2 compliant which is compatible with sofo vid cap application. the presets in the file types already have this. |
March 7th, 2004, 05:02 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bemidji, MN
Posts: 276
|
Along these lines. I have a video project coming up that will be divided into 4 or 5 sections. My opening sequence will be in slo-mo using a velocity envelope, overlayed with pictures that will be transparent.
Will I be better off to render that clip seperately, probably to AVI, then add the following sections and render the whole?
__________________
"DOH"!!! |
March 7th, 2004, 09:24 PM | #7 |
Sponsor: JET DV
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 7,953
|
If I have 4 or 5 distinct sections, I'll build 4 or 5 distinct projects and render each one separately. Once each section is finished, I build a final project consisting of those sections. That final project will render VERY quickly.
|
March 8th, 2004, 11:11 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
be aware that even though Avi is a good format, the more you render, the more chance that quality will degrade.
Its still a compressed format. you wil notice this degradation first with vertical lines in your footage.. when you see htee lines (look like vertical scanlines) you know when to stop re-rendering |
March 8th, 2004, 11:17 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bemidji, MN
Posts: 276
|
There shouldn't be any recompression going on when rendering an AVI to AVI, it should only compress anything that has changed. At least that's the way I understand it.
__________________
"DOH"!!! |
March 8th, 2004, 12:08 PM | #10 |
Sponsor: JET DV
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 7,953
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Harry Settle : There shouldn't be any recompression going on when rendering an AVI to AVI, it should only compress anything that has changed. At least that's the way I understand it. -->>>
That is correct (assuming DV-AVI to DV-AVI). However the question becomes: did he do "something" to change it? |
March 8th, 2004, 03:30 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bemidji, MN
Posts: 276
|
Sorry, I was being selfish. I was referring to my rendering scenerio, in which I would be going DV-AVI to DV-AVI.
I know that like everyone else, I don't want to be overcompressing files either.
__________________
"DOH"!!! |
March 11th, 2004, 07:25 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bemidji, MN
Posts: 276
|
OK. I just finished rendering my title sequence. 5 min AVI. 1.5gb file size.
Consiststs of a four min music track. Main track is slow motion, 5%. 1st overlay track is multiple 5-10 second video clips, cropped to an upper corner, edges feathered, transparent composite level over entire track. There is one 12 second jpeg collage consisting of ten layers, all pictures cropped. Rendered it all out to ntsc DV, took only 24 minutes.
__________________
"DOH"!!! |
March 11th, 2004, 10:58 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bemidji, MN
Posts: 276
|
You are right Edward. I am very happy with the rendering time with my recent change to the P4 3.2.
I just rendered the 5 min AVI file to mpeg in 5 min 1 sec. AC3 in about 7 sec. Burned it in DVDA in 7 min. All of your rendering tips have worked for me. thanks Now, all I have to do is complete filming, producing and editing the whole rest of the project.
__________________
"DOH"!!! |
| ||||||
|
|