|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 16th, 2009, 07:06 PM | #31 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,048
|
Terry,
I knew about prerender, did not realize it traveled with the project and thought it was temporary fromwhat I read!! I will try it on tomarrow, rendering a 20 gig br at this time. thanks for the further information!! the more I learn of Vegas the more i need to know it seems!!
__________________
DATS ALL FOLKS Dale W. Guthormsen |
April 17th, 2009, 09:57 AM | #32 | ||
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,420
|
Quote:
Quote:
See page 298 of the vegas 8 manual. By default, these prerenders are saved. There's a pref to clear them when you close the project, and also a menu command to clear them. But they are a very, very handy tool...
__________________
30 years of pro media production. Vegas user since 1.0. Webcaster since 1997. Freelancer since 2000. College instructor since 2001. |
||
April 17th, 2009, 05:45 PM | #33 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Winnipeg Canada
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
Sony Creative Software - Forums - Vegas Pro - Video Messages It was initially worked out for avchd but works with HDV as well. |
|
May 13th, 2009, 10:53 AM | #34 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 398
|
So far multi-core preview is working awesome... on clips I used to get 10-12fps on, I get a solid 29.97 and see 80-90% CPU usage (q6600 @ 3.0ghz)
Excited to try Vegas 8.1 out (or 9.0) with 12GB ram and an I7 920... @ 3.6-4.0ghz But won't find out till I decide to spend some moneh... |
May 14th, 2009, 04:07 PM | #35 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 663
|
I am also experiencing a significant increase in preview performance. I've got a quad core @3ghz w/ 8GB RAM.
Thanks! |
May 18th, 2009, 02:30 PM | #36 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Unfortunately I discovered very stuttery playback when I turned this on just now. I have an Athlon 64 X2 CPU with 2GB of RAM, so obviously not a big work horse. This system is just slightly slower than my Core 2 Duo system.
|
May 19th, 2009, 07:56 AM | #37 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: hungary
Posts: 462
|
I also tested the multicore setting!
PAL DV AVI project, with a simple dissolve between two clips and preview via camcorder DV IN with full(best) setting. With my E2160 processor i get 17-18 fps with the default settingin the middle of the transition, and when enabled multicore, i get 19-20. So a little increase in performance. But interesting is how much cpu power is needed for this 2 fps increase: in first case the 2 core is about 60-65%, and in the second, every core is above 90% http://www.relaxvideo.hu/false.jpg http://www.relaxvideo.hu/true.jpg I think this is the reaseon why not enabled by default the multicore preview. Maybe the code isnt well written for dualcore support (or buggy?). Somebody have a config that can play back two stream with dissolve in full quality and full fps on camcorder? Another settings that i have changed, and like it: video seekscrub: 16ms (i get very quick response when scrubbing like in Virtual dub!) meter refresh rate 16ms event selection outline thickness 3 (easier identify which event is selected) thx for info! edited: i also tested without camcorder, only preview on pc monitor i add a color correction and a title at the dissolve, and when disabled multicore i get 11 fps, when enabled, i get 6! Weird!! |
| ||||||
|
|