|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 22nd, 2008, 01:56 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 340
|
Edward, Jeff... thanks so much. I guess I'll keep both for now then (since space isn't an issue), and have a go with each in turn. I was thinking it was like when you used to open, say a Vegas 4 file with Vegas 5... seems like it upgraded the file and you couldn't go back. I was wanting to use the 64 bit to be able to use my 6 Gigs of RAM for rendering, etc. You wouldn't happen to know if either version has any trouble with dual video cards installed? I have two 9800 GT cards. Will search the boards.
This always was the best place for prompt, knowledgeable answers... I'm grateful it still is! Off to fire her up. I'm excited to be back with Vegas! Marcia |
September 22nd, 2008, 01:59 PM | #17 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
I don't know about the cards. I'd just run it and see how it does first.
|
September 22nd, 2008, 02:02 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 435
|
Quote:
It doesn't look like you'll have to avail yourself of this procedure. For the record, if you do run into problems, the only solution I have ever seen here and on the Sony forums is to install and register 8.1 on a clean installation of Vista. It is a kludge solution, for sure, but it works. Steve |
|
September 22nd, 2008, 02:06 PM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 435
|
Quote:
Steve |
|
September 22nd, 2008, 04:53 PM | #20 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
The black frames issue and preview issue might go away with a clean install, but I don't believe it will. I'm not saying other issues aren't prevented on a clean OS, but I just happen to be of the opinion it won't fix this. I don't care enough to find out because I can't use it with Ultimate S and Magic Bullet anyway.
When I next reinstall Vista again I will find out. It would be nice if it worked. But truthfully, saving a little time on a rendering doesn't matter much to me. My video projects render so fast now I can't believe it, unless I'm using MB, and I don't use MB that much anyway. |
September 22nd, 2008, 07:32 PM | #21 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 435
|
Quote:
Now, the big difference is that preview speed and quality take a major hit in 8.0c compared to 8.1 on my system. For instance, I get full 30fps when previewing avi clips at Best/Auto or Best/Full in 8.1. That gets whacked down to about 12-15 fps in 8.0c. Apparently 8.1 is nicely optimized to work on a 64 bit system. Differences in *render times* aren't that large, however, as between 8.1 and 8.0c. Since I just, um, graduated to HDV, I think I'll tap into the smoother editing experience in 8.1 once I finish my last project in 8.0c. Steve |
|
| ||||||
|
|