|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 4th, 2008, 03:24 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 421
|
up-rez software (SD-HDV)
I was wondering if there is any good up-rez software to use SD files and output them on Bluray disc.
|
July 4th, 2008, 04:55 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 2,237
|
Not aware of a Vegas specific software, but InstantHD for After Effects is available from Red Giant and I am on the beta trial for InstantHD Pro (actually they are calling it something else now - can't recall what!). The latter is VERY good (but not quite ready yet - I believe release is imminent, though).
Also, I think Spot (Douglas Spotted Eagle) mentioned another software that does something similar in a recent post. Can't put my finger on it just now and am also dog tired so going to bed! (Edit - this does not handle the output to bluray, of couse, just the up-rezzing) |
July 4th, 2008, 05:50 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,414
|
Cineform does a good job of up-rezzing...
|
July 9th, 2008, 12:14 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 421
|
how to use cineform for up-rezing?
|
July 9th, 2008, 12:31 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
if you are ok to convert your movie to a serie of pictures, photozoom is ok too.
|
July 10th, 2008, 02:21 PM | #6 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Quote:
I was thinking of offering the ability to deliver on HD if I filmed in SD, but I wanted to check here and see if that meant I would loose nothing from the source DV. In otherwords, I thought it should be possible for the source DV recorded straight off the MiniDV tape (in SD) to be rendered to HD (however that works) by dropping the SD media onto an HD project time line and then rendering to HD. The way I would _think_ it should work is that rendering to HD using SD source would take the SD source and practically transfer it straight to the compressed HD with little to no loss in information. After all, SD has 1/4 the pixels of HD so the compress & render to HD using SD source material should be almost lossless, right? |
|
July 10th, 2008, 04:21 PM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Windsor, ON Canada
Posts: 2,770
|
There's no need to use Pan/Crop.
Load in your SD file and render it out in the HD format of your choice. I just tried rendering an SD clip in various sizes of HD AVI and Blu-Ray formats and it didn't look too bad on my 24" editing monitor. |
July 10th, 2008, 06:26 PM | #8 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Quote:
I'm just trying to figure out if there is any value added benefit to potential clients that actually do have Blu-Ray / PS3 systems. |
|
July 10th, 2008, 06:58 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 366
|
Quote:
I've been editing a project where I am mixing SD and HD and rendering out as HD. The HD looks great and the SD looks like SD displayed on an HD TV. Not terrible but definately not HD. To make this work I am either going to have to up-rez the SD using one of the AE plug-ins or scale down the images and play games with PinP and tiled images. An SD image displayed at 720x480 will look awfully small while an SD image displayed at 1080 will be a bit blurry. Without uprezing the images, SD will look like SD. |
|
July 11th, 2008, 05:24 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 376
|
|
July 11th, 2008, 05:56 PM | #11 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Quote:
So what it sounds like I'm hearing, is that there is NO benefit to deliver SD media via Vegas in HD unless the media has first been upresed. So delivery in HD will still compress the SD footage, even though the SD footage has far less information. Correct? |
|
July 11th, 2008, 07:09 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 366
|
I'm not sure what you mean by "compress the SD footage".
Keeping it really simple - a 1440x1080 frame has 4.5 times as many pixels as a 720x480 frame. A frame that is 480 pixels high will look fuzzy stretched over a 1080 pixel high frame. Vegas will stretch the SD frames, in which case the image will look fuzzy or, you can set the SD image up at 720 x480, in which case it will retain its original resolution but look awfully small on an HD monitor. The Video Enhancer Software looks very interesting. I'll have to play around with it this weekend. |
July 11th, 2008, 08:42 PM | #13 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Quote:
I've heard many times that MPEG2 compression (SD or otherwise) throws away a lot of data (it has to in order to fit 1hf of footage into just 4.3GB of disc space). Is it possible to put SD footage in an uncompressed file format on Blu-Ray media in order to retain all that picture data? THe real issue with SD DVD players is the data rate they can handle, right? 9Mbps or so? What data rate can a Blue-Ray work with? 25Mbps? Or at least in a less compressed format that MPEG2? |
|
July 12th, 2008, 05:11 AM | #14 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 366
|
Quote:
SD is, by definition, lower resolution than HD. Without some sort of software or hardware "fix" to interpolate all the missing pixels, a 720x480 image is going to look fuzzy when stretched to 1440x1080. This applies to a still image or a frame of video. Software and hardware uprezing will help but from what I'v seen, they won't do miracles either. |
|
July 12th, 2008, 05:39 AM | #15 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
i always use uprezzing like this.
uprez to image size bigger than what you need, then apply filters to clean picture, the size down to final size. video enhancer is great for this because you can add all the filters for virtualdub. take care that video enhancer is just twice doubling when uprezzing 4x. so they said on their web site that you better will double and double again than going directly to 4X. using Neat video with video enhancer will give you astonishing good result while requiring intensive calculation. for the the best quality use uncompressed video (no codec) or Huffyuv you disk space is a concern. my last attempt was on a 1 hours theater performance and takes 200gig and 2 days of calculation. (and i discovered later that a used the wrong file !). |
| ||||||
|
|