|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 24th, 2008, 03:07 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 26
|
Stabilization for Vegas 8.0b?
I've read the following post about stabilizer plug-ins, or lack thereof, for Vegas:
http://dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.ph...=stabilization However, everything I've read about Deshaker deals with DV. Does anyone know if 8.0b contains any stabilizing filters, or know of a way to have it fixed using AVCHD files? |
April 24th, 2008, 03:22 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 8,425
|
No Stephen, Vegas has nothing like that. The best I that I know of is that you can use a third party program to stabilize then render and bring rendered footage into Vegas.
I don't use any of those programs so I can't recommend one. Used on in the past and it was just so-so. |
April 24th, 2008, 04:12 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 13
|
Stephen,
ProDad Mercalli has just been released. I've purchased it and am very pleased with the results on my AVCHD footage. http://www.prodad.de/gb/mercalli_std_details.html
__________________
-Dan |
April 24th, 2008, 04:20 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 84
|
I use Mercalli & it works great for me.
You can see an example of it's use by following the link. I didn't hide the boarders so you can see the results. http://www.bhagavideo.com/CProjects.html |
April 25th, 2008, 07:01 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 26
|
i've seen the mercalli software, but for how little i need it, i can't justify the $50/100 on it. i may try the deshaker out with virtualdub. i was just hoping something could snap-in nicely with vegas. oh well :(
|
April 25th, 2008, 10:33 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sofia Bulgaria
Posts: 147
|
Still nothing compares to Deshaker - it does excellent result, also for much shorter time than Mercalli and any others. With Deshaker you can stabilize perfectly without any using of the zoom option!!! During my long time expierence I tried less or more shaking videos, which become a really smoothly stabilized videos after my custom made parameters in Deshaker.
Also, believe me or not, after using Deshaker in VirtualDub (and then to Vegas for further editing) the footage becomes much more cinemantic as a motion! |
April 25th, 2008, 11:14 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 26
|
do you have any guidelines/suggestions for AVCHD content using deshaker? I've converted the m2ts file to avi, but the default deshaker settings feel a bit "soft" for me. what settings do you normally use?
|
April 25th, 2008, 01:34 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Esher, Surrey
Posts: 89
|
**********Deleted
Last edited by Dugi Barr; April 25th, 2008 at 01:38 PM. Reason: Deleted |
April 26th, 2008, 10:27 AM | #9 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
|
|
April 26th, 2008, 11:22 PM | #10 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: london UK
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
I prefer to use "static borders" in Mercalli rather than "dynamic borders", it's less distracting and combined with a bit of scaling you can hardly notice the borders.
__________________
www.springproductions.co.uk |
|
April 27th, 2008, 02:23 AM | #11 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sofia Bulgaria
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD6qeExMh40 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiIopaMrh2M It is better for you to adjust the right parameters and the right values in Deshaker, instead of using it just as you got it. |
|
April 27th, 2008, 08:46 AM | #12 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
Not that I don't agree with what you are saying but from my website where the video was at "Bhaga Video Productions did not shoot any of the videos on this page." As I stated the borders are there so you can see what Mercalli can do. Eventually I will create a before and after and place the current film in between the two. I agree that dynamic boarders are distracting. With all of that said the fact is that we get footage all of the time that is "not so good". I just have a smile on my face and say "I might be able to fix that". |
|
April 27th, 2008, 09:18 AM | #13 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
Original quality of video, what the subject is (soft lines vs hard lines), is the object moving or stationary, how bad the camera movement is, etc. When I first used deshaker I did not notice the borders but one day I saw it. It was the bumper of a car that was slightly out of alignment. It was a full in your face walk around of a car that filled all of the frame. As I said it does a good job at creating a border. Perhaps someone could have done better and perhaps there are some situations that just cannot be perfect. Most people watching the video would have never seen it (and I didn't see it the first few times I watched it) but it was there. |
|
April 27th, 2008, 11:07 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 84
|
Follow the link and look at the front bumper on the right side of the screen. You will see the deshake border that was created. Once you see the border on the bumper you can see it going up the side of the frame. There again it is very good and when the video is running and the camera is moving you don't really notice it like you do when you see the still frame.
http://www.bhagavideo.com/pictures/C...;20Deshake.jpg |
April 28th, 2008, 01:38 AM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: london UK
Posts: 170
|
Sorry Harold missed that bit!
__________________
www.springproductions.co.uk |
| ||||||
|
|