|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 16th, 2008, 04:23 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rome
Posts: 38
|
Anyone knows the proportions?
Hi,
I Need to transform a 16:9 video in a 2:35 but Vegas doesn't have the preset in the pan/crop option... Anyone knows what are the proportions I need? Thank You, Marco Maiello |
March 16th, 2008, 07:43 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southport - UK
Posts: 208
|
Hi Marco
If you're a PAL user keeping 720 wide - I think setting the vertical height to 445 would give you a 2.35:1 frame. I think. Ian |
March 16th, 2008, 10:12 AM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rome
Posts: 38
|
Thank You ; )
I'll try! |
March 16th, 2008, 02:05 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
you have to take in account of the pixel shape.
if you calculate with square pixel , image width is 768 and not 720. if you take a DV Pal or DV NTSC, this is not the same either. Since there is already about 432 pixel height for 16/9 i think there is even less for a 2.35 picture. currently it is pretty bad to process video that way, since we live in a wide screen world. You better to expand horizontally and/or use anamorphosed video (like a letterboxed 16/9 video or even better a real 2.35 anamorphosed format) for editing and make the final export formatted as you need according the different display available. the best would be to upscale to a 1280x576 HDV format (720p) with the remaining lines filled with black. |
March 16th, 2008, 04:53 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vineyard, Utah
Posts: 192
|
Just take your image width (1920, for HD), and divide that by 2.35. (1920/2.35=817) [(If your Pixel Aspect Ratio is 1.0)].
Just make a new template in the Pan/Crop tool, from the dropdown menu. SB |
March 17th, 2008, 05:17 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southport - UK
Posts: 208
|
I assumed Marco was shooting/capturing in SD - not HD. In SD I don't think you can just devide by 2.35 - you have to take the pixel aspect ratio into account - 1.456 - which is what I did. That gives 1048x576 - an effective ratio of 1.82. Changing 576 to 445/446 ish gives approx 2.35.
But I've never fully understood aspect ratios so happy to be corrected. :-) Ian |
| ||||||
|
|