|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 4th, 2007, 05:38 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 129
|
Cineform?
If you are working with gearshift to make proxies and only render to final formats from the mt2 after all is done, is there any benefit to using cineform anyway? or is it a great way to save a final (almost uncompressed) master of the finished product? And is there anyway to put it back out (cut into smaller sections maybe) tape? and if you can does that get recompressed or saved as an avi like standard dv did?
|
December 7th, 2007, 06:24 AM | #2 | |||
Sponsor: VASST
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
~jr
__________________
Developer: VASST Ultimate S, Scattershot 3D, Mayhem, FASST Apps, and other VASST Software plug-ins Web Site: www.johnrofrano.com |
|||
December 11th, 2007, 02:01 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 129
|
OK, so a question or two, regarding using a hv20 or hg10 instead of xha1, do I need to use cineform to get a 24p? or gearshift proxies from mt2 than edit than mt2 timeline to final output would be fine? if so than do I need to use cineform first from mt2 than gearshift from the cineform files since they have been changed into a real 24p ?
Assuming I shot 24 of course. And if I work on the edits and color and all work, have a finished timeline and output a copy to dvd and a copy to wmv and one for QT and have a master in either uncompressed HD on Harddrive's and I was thinking if I get coneform I would output one to that on dvd (figuring about 40gigs per hour I think would get an hour per bluray) So given the above to put a copy back on tape (just as a final resort back up) I still need to do another render to mt2? I cant play the avi to tape? Sorry for all the questions, just seems like there is no clear answers to many of them and searching gets 5 differing answer to each based on hdmi, and aja, and premiere/finalcut/avid/vegas and ten other variables which makes it hard to get a defintive answer to anything. |
December 11th, 2007, 04:03 PM | #4 | ||||
Sponsor: VASST
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
~jr
__________________
Developer: VASST Ultimate S, Scattershot 3D, Mayhem, FASST Apps, and other VASST Software plug-ins Web Site: www.johnrofrano.com |
||||
December 13th, 2007, 03:22 AM | #5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NY, NY
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Sorry for all the questions you have been a great help already and I appeciate it. I am trying to learn and make buying choices based on what is really needed first before what is a time saver or convinience so I can spend wisely as I go through buying everything I need to do everything. |
|
December 13th, 2007, 10:17 AM | #6 | |||
Sponsor: VASST
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
CineForm Neo is not "needed" but may be "desired". I have CineForm Connect HD and to my eyes it does a better job of deinterlacing and converting Sony CineFrame (24f) to 24p than Sony Vegas does. The cadence just looks smoother to me. I have no idea how it looks with HV20 footage. I would highly recommend that you download the trial of Neo and judge for yourself if it does a better job than Vegas alone on HV20 footage. That's what the trials of GearShift and Neo are for. Quote:
Quote:
~jr
__________________
Developer: VASST Ultimate S, Scattershot 3D, Mayhem, FASST Apps, and other VASST Software plug-ins Web Site: www.johnrofrano.com |
|||
| ||||||
|
|