|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 20th, 2007, 12:19 PM | #31 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Quote:
Also, the point of my thread was that it was unprofessional of the photographer to stand right in front of a camera when we had previously discussed it's placement. I'm not bothered by a photographer who walks around up front or who has to pass in front of my camera sometimes. I have a problem when I've discussed the camera placement with the photographer and then the photographer ignores this discussion and stands in front of the camera, completely blocking the shot. Saying that "photog's in front of the camera is a fact of life" is the wrong attitude to have in my opinion. As professionals, it shouldn't be that hard to work together so that both of us get the shots we need. |
|
September 2nd, 2007, 10:25 PM | #32 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rochester MN
Posts: 68
|
Okay I had to dig this post up again. I just got back from shooting a wedding and had to work with the most unprofessional photographer I've ever seen. Besides her long speech at the rehearsal telling the entire wedding party that she didn't want anyone else (as in guests) taking pictures during the wedding, she was trying to tell me where I should be filming from. Throughout the entire ceremony she kept coming up to the balcony I was filming from and talking to her assistant right next to my camera. Well there goes that audio. To make things worse during the reception every time there was a speech or anything else I was shooting she would come stand right in front of the camera. I was standing off to the side and back a little ways so I wouldn't be in other peoples way that were trying to see the speeches or dances but she even had the nerve to come look at my screen, saw I was filming and had a good shot and then walked up about five feet and stood in front of my camera. I was so furious by the end of the night. One time I gave her a very dirty look and she just smiled and walked away. I did tell the groom at the end of the night that I'd try to edit what I could but she was in front of the camera most of the time. It didn't sound like the B&G were any to happy with her either. Okay I guess that's enough I just needed to vent.
|
September 3rd, 2007, 08:52 AM | #33 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,065
|
Just my two cents, but about the only recourse you or anyone of us have, is a law suit. Then maybe that person will think twice about interfering in someone elses work. I've worked with this type of person before, they have a god complex.
__________________
What happens if I push the 'Red' button? |
September 3rd, 2007, 09:36 AM | #34 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Frankly in a case like this, I think litigation is far more trouble than it's worth. Not to mention the expense involved... in my opinion your best course of action is to chalk it up to experience and never shoot a wedding with that particular photographer again. When I shot weddings, the second question I always asked the prospective customer (after determining when and where the wedding would be), was "who is the photographer." I had a very short list of photographers (two or three) that I refused to work with based on similar past experiences. If the couple hadn't yet signed a photographer by the time they got to me (very rare), then I'd point them to our photographer or one from a list of photographers we knew we worked well with.
A smooth, healthy relationship between photographer and videographer is mission-critical for providing a good package to the customer. |
September 3rd, 2007, 10:46 AM | #35 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belgium
Posts: 9,510
|
In Belgium you just have to deal with it, never heared about law suites for these reasons. I allways look at the photographer and give him/her the room needed, if I see I end up in their shot I quickly move away if possible, that allways has resulted in the photog making room for me afterwards.
One time I had a photog driving so fast to a fotoshoot (The couple was with him) and because I didn't know exaclty were he went (It was somewere close to a lake so no real street name I could enter in my gps) and when I lost him at a traffic light I just went to the the place were they had the reception. I allready warned the couple then, and still do now, that if the photog doesn't wait for me I won't start seaching and go directly to the reception. |
September 4th, 2007, 01:09 AM | #36 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
I agree that a lawsuit probably wouldn't be the best course of action for me. However, I also don't have the luxury (yet!) of turning down weddings because of the photographer that the couple picked. It's pretty hard to book videography in my market, and I have bills to pay, so I can't turn down a job unless it's for a much better reason.
|
September 4th, 2007, 07:53 AM | #37 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Rochester MN
Posts: 68
|
I'd agree. I can't really afford a lawsuit either but if I could I know I'd be taking this photographer to court. I just can't believe that some people are that rude. And yes she did have a God complex. If I didn't mind interrupting the reception I would have chewed her out right there but than again that would have made me look bad too.
|
September 4th, 2007, 12:36 PM | #38 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denver, Colorado USA
Posts: 654
|
Man, I can't believe what I'm hearing. Take them to court? What do you do when a guest blocks your shot?
I quit complaining about people getting in the way and just got another camera. :) It's the nature of the business - somebody's going to get in the way. But why you would keep letting the same person do it over and over again is beyond me. |
September 4th, 2007, 12:50 PM | #39 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
Kev -
Sounds like she knew she was messing with you - I'd explain that to the B&G, and let them address the issue. It's a darn shame that some people forget whose DAY this is and make it about themselves - anyone deliberately making themselves the most important thing should get 5 minutes in a locked room with the bride and a bat... perhas a gentle reminder about professionalism and why she was there would have been effective? It amazes me how someone will practically walk right into your cam, pop offscreen and pop back on just to say "sorry" as if they really wanted to make sure their stupidity recorded for posterity was somehow offset by their "manners". Speaking of which, you might make a short reel of your special photog to show to the B&G (or there's youtoob <wink>). Maybe a bit of public "exposure" of the special talents involved will be helpful to others <wink>. Just for your future reference, this is why most of my rigging can be set to shoot over Herman Munster... tall tripods, etc... prepare for the inevitable! Taller tripods and Monopods are heavier, but when you need an extra foot extension, it's worth it. If you can get to 6 ft, it'll cover most situations, but the tall pods are harder to find. I just added a Giottos P-Pod myself (tall 5 section monopod with screw in legs hidden in the bottom section) - so far it seems like a nice piece, I wish the extension locks were lever not twist, but I'm sure it will come in handy on some shoots! |
September 4th, 2007, 01:24 PM | #40 | |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
We are the professionals and as professionals we need to get our job done properly and not allow these photogs to destroy our work. After all if you are standing in front of Judge Judy (bad example I know, she's not a real judge) or any real judge for that matter being sued for not doing your job properly... A judge is not going to accept as an excuse "The photog was in my way", their response will be: "Why didn't you move?". To allow a photog to do this to you is not to do you job. I can easily say I'm sorry I blocked your view to a guest, I can't easily say to a bride "well your photog ruined the video". I had a photog one time mess with my assitant; unknown to me he walked up and locked my assistants tripod legs with his own. Something easy to undo really but my assistant had never encounted this, and I was locked to where I was on the altar. So he quietly allowed this photog to block his shot, as the photog's tripod sat there and the photog walked around hand held. I was livid when I found out he had missed some of his shots but since we had never discussed such an incident and what to do I only had myself to blame. A month later we worked with the same photog, I took the back of the church position and the photog had something new coming. He locked the tripod legs, I just collapsed mine and moved 2 feet right (10 foot wide aisle, no reason to lock legs). He moved to relock the legs, I shifted to a position on the side of the tripod blocking him. He gave me a dirty look, gave up and took the camera handheld and then moved to block my shot. I dismounted and in seconds was standing right next to him on the aisle. We stayed in lockstep for 5 minutes till he finally gave up and moved to another location in the church. At the reception I gave him one chance, as soon as he moved to block one of the cameras, he suddenly not only had 1 person on his side, but two. My assistant and I treated him like the meat on a sandwich taking up positions on either side of him and staying in lockstep the entire time. Finally after the first dances he looked at me called me a name and said he'd leave us alone for the rest of the time. You don't have to interfere with their work but you do have to get yours done properly. Don't let them push you around and get your shot! |
|
September 4th, 2007, 02:13 PM | #41 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Well actually, Judith Sheindlin has in fact been a real judge for over 25 years. Not to mention also one of the most successful female television personalities of all time. Whether you like Judge Judy or not, you have to acknowledge and appreciate her success (and no I am not a fan of the show, but I certainly recognize her for her accomplishments). Sorry for the off-topic tangent...
|
September 4th, 2007, 02:51 PM | #42 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,065
|
Quote:
__________________
What happens if I push the 'Red' button? |
|
September 4th, 2007, 02:58 PM | #43 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 446
|
I feel the pain. Here is one of my previous post's.
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...typical+photog |
September 4th, 2007, 04:18 PM | #44 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denver, Colorado USA
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
I also know there are prima donna photographers out there that won't accomodate us... all the more reason for another cam angle. |
|
September 5th, 2007, 01:11 PM | #45 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 179
|
Photogs Behaving Badly
At the last wedding I shot, the photog decided to stand directly in my line when the best man was giving the speech at the reception. The funny (?) thing is, he turned around and looked right at me and continued to stand there taking pictures. I was there first! Geeze, I sound like my four-year-old son...
Anyway, the reception hall was packed, and I have some very amateur looking footage from the camera while I moved it to a new location.
__________________
Woz |
| ||||||
|
|