|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 19th, 2006, 08:31 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 189
|
Love Story + SDE
Couple has a unique story. They have known each other since they were 5.
Music was choosen by clients. Its a little too classical for me..but they both played violin so they wanted it. It also has a short SDE (same day edit) at the end. This full clip was screened at the reception. http://homepage.mac.com/epiphany2002/timrhea_full.wmv
__________________
DBoZ |
November 20th, 2006, 05:08 PM | #2 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Bandwidth
Quote:
Jason |
|
November 20th, 2006, 05:58 PM | #3 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Music
Quote:
|
|
November 20th, 2006, 06:05 PM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
.Mac accounts have unlimited bandwith.
__________________
DBoZ |
|
November 20th, 2006, 06:26 PM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
Technicals
I work a lot with the Ken Burns effect of slow pans, zooms, across still photos so I liked your style to start with. A few pointers:
1) Crop images that have white borders (probably due to scanning issues) 2) Don't end a zoom / pan before the fade starts. It makes the pan/zoom look a bit unplaned. Either slow the zoom / pan down so that the time needed is filled or start the cut / fade sooner. 3) VERY nice use of dialog / interviews. I like how you have some segments about 20 seconds of just music with the photos before the next interview. 4) The guys voice levels are a bit subdued compared to the background music at times. Consider adjusting the music levels down (slow changes of course) so his dialog is more prominet when compared to the music (specifically around 8:20) 5) I notice that most of the photos immediately before interview footage have a hard cut, and all photo transitiosn are crossfades (my favorite). This ends up making the transition to video very abrupt. Not sure specifically what to offer on that.... possibly a short crossfade (15 frames or less) or a fade to black/white and backup. 6) Most of your still photo effects are zooming in. Consider mixing slow pans or rotations with the zooms. The zoom effect (as others have told me of my sample) can get overused if continually in, in, in. General comments: Who did the photos of the couple with the nice use of the depth of field (brick wall shot at 13:06). Just curious because I really like that shot. :-) The couples story is amazing of course, especially considering the time span. Glad they had a love story made because that kind of story just is great for our medium.... a love story movie. Despite the above comments sounding nit-picky, I loved your story and thought it flowed well. Over all run time is good 17 minutes. Jason Last edited by Jason Robinson; November 21st, 2006 at 12:48 PM. |
November 21st, 2006, 01:28 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 32
|
You've already proven yourself to be a cut above, Daniel, and you've produced some wonderful and memorable video over the past couple of years that I've known you.
For me, this video is your best work to date that you've shared with us... You've moved up a gear and all your clients are lucky people!!! M |
November 21st, 2006, 09:57 PM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
Thanks dude..you are too kind.
__________________
DBoZ |
|
November 22nd, 2006, 05:17 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 32
|
Someone else in their infinite wisdom decided my surname was Sirr... and I conveniently hid behind it for awhile because it I found it a tad funny.
Too kind? You know me - love or it hate it I'll say it as I see it. Mossy |
November 22nd, 2006, 11:33 AM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
LOL..too funny. Thought was a very "un-Irish" name. :)
__________________
DBoZ |
|
November 25th, 2006, 03:45 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 163
|
pretty slick Dee Boz
__________________
www.dmbvideo.com |
November 26th, 2006, 08:10 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 156
|
This is a lot of nice work. I do echo what Jason has said. I also was distracted by the background composition of the broll interviews. I didn't like the fireplace mantel right at face level and the round plate later on. I found that distracting.
Mike |
November 30th, 2006, 07:13 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC Area.
Posts: 550
|
Very good video!
I have 2 questions: 1) How much did you charge? (if you are willing to share that information) 2) How did you get them to talk in such detail and not just answer your questions out right? (that is a problem I have, no matter I I phrase the question its always a 2 sentence answer) |
November 30th, 2006, 07:39 PM | #13 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
Thanks. That package was $3500. I had a really articulate couple I guess. I didn't do anything special other just have a conversation with them.
__________________
DBoZ |
|
December 1st, 2006, 08:36 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durango, Colorado, USA
Posts: 711
|
Clean and simple and to the point. I have always felt the use of still images made so much more visual sense in the summary forms of wedding videos than real time... it gives the viewer time for revisiting memories. In any case you have made a remarkably good blend of past and present. The story is well said.
__________________
Waldemar |
December 3rd, 2006, 06:41 AM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Simsbury, CT
Posts: 247
|
Great job, Daniel, great use of music, timing, etc. $3500 for all of that including SDE and all day wedding coverage? You should have charged at least twice that.
|
| ||||||
|
|