|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 27th, 2006, 01:43 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tiffin, Ohio
Posts: 77
|
My Wedding Recap Highlight Video from first wedding.
Hello all,
I just finished shooting my first wedding. It was for a friend and I just made this wedding recap to see how things turned out and to share with you fine folks. Some of the shots are a bit shaky but im working on it. Overall, I was very pleased with how things turned out. Thanks http://www.brickroadvideo.com/profitceremony.wmv Song: The Rose by Bette Midler Size: 34MB Right Click and Save Target As. |
July 27th, 2006, 02:17 PM | #2 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Riverbank, California
Posts: 32
|
Quote:
Cara |
|
July 27th, 2006, 02:19 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: College Park, Maryland
Posts: 913
|
Congrats on filming your first wedding. The wonderful part you did it for a friend. Easy way to get your feet wet. One very distracting element is that your slow-mo killed my eyes. It's like it was shot at a high shutter interlaced and then you slow-mo'ed it and it was just to distracting. I guess the best way to say it is that it was like two images on top of each other. Besides that good job on your first attempt and keep pushing yourself practicing and viewing others clips and get some training material (it helps (helped me)). Take Care thanks for sharing
Monday |
July 27th, 2006, 02:28 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
John:
For some reason, the aspect ratio seems off, and everyone seemed a bit "squished" to me. Did you do some fooling with the aspect ratio, or am I just imagining things ? It was showing in about a 16:9 format on my Real and Media players.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
July 27th, 2006, 02:35 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tiffin, Ohio
Posts: 77
|
It was 16:9 and I dunno whether its when I captured it in Premiere or when I rendered it but its like super huge. Maybe that can explain it. The only other thing I can think of is im doing something wrong with the footage.
|
July 27th, 2006, 02:41 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tiffin, Ohio
Posts: 77
|
Also, on initial exports the interlacing was awful. I applied a Field Interpolate filter but now it makes the slow-mo all blurry. How can I go about fixing it?
|
July 27th, 2006, 02:57 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Satellite Beach, Fl
Posts: 784
|
"It was 16:9 and I dunno whether its when I captured it in Premiere or when I rendered it but its like super huge. Maybe that can explain it. The only other thing I can think of is im doing something wrong with the footage."
When you brought into premire did you have the settings right for the project? Try importing it into another timeline with different settings. |
July 27th, 2006, 03:01 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tiffin, Ohio
Posts: 77
|
Yeah I will try that. When I set the footage into the timeline on a widescreen project it doesn't fit. I have to "interpret" the footage from Square Pixel's to Widescreen. I assume thats not what it's supposed to do. I will keep trying with different things. Thanks for the quick feedback everyone.
|
July 27th, 2006, 06:01 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
John:
What are you shooting with ? Looks to me like you are shooting in with a 4:3 format, and squishing it into wide screen. If thats the case, you will have distortion. You would need to crop if you are doing that.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
July 27th, 2006, 06:28 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tiffin, Ohio
Posts: 77
|
I shoot with a Panasonic DVC30.
|
July 27th, 2006, 07:05 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tiffin, Ohio
Posts: 77
|
It's wierd because it shoots 16:9 but when I do a widescreen project it imports it as 4:3 so I have to interpret the footage which is where I assume I get the "squished" look. It all fits fine in a standard project. I checked the camera and it was in Normal so I don't know.
|
July 27th, 2006, 08:09 PM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 69
|
Nice work there. The clip of the empty church could maybe be left on the cutting room floor--there are people standing around and a man walking upstairs. I like the song and the overall speed of the clip. Maybe at the very end you could add in the live audio of "Mr & Mrs whoever" and the crowd clapping.
How many cameras did you have going and where were they located? Are all your cams DVC30s? |
July 27th, 2006, 08:23 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tiffin, Ohio
Posts: 77
|
One DVC30 and one Canon consumer backup. I moved around quite alot during the ceremony. There were three balconies so I took advantage of it. I see what you are saying about the church shot. I have another church shot but I liked this one better for some reason. I'll keep the announcment of the couple suggestion handy. Thanks for the reply.
|
July 27th, 2006, 11:51 PM | #14 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tiffin, Ohio
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
|
|
July 28th, 2006, 01:18 AM | #15 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elk Grove CA
Posts: 6,838
|
Quote:
As with others, I don't think you need the empty church shot. I would lose it. And the church sign is a bit strange for what looks like a beautiful building. You can stretch this particular piece by putting bride entering in slow motion. As it is now, she looks a bit jerky as she is coming in. Slow motion would make her more graceful. Take it down to something like 60% of normal.
__________________
Chris J. Barcellos |
|
| ||||||
|
|