|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 2nd, 2006, 08:12 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Posts: 721
|
Waldemar has ideas with merit
Well planned production will always win. This is real documentary work so why not be the best at it.
Thanks for the insightful piece on mic placement for a bride. I think this will work just fine. Also, your cool reply is a welcome contrast to the "DUUUUUDE what are you doing" perspective. |
March 2nd, 2006, 08:20 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 190
|
Well, here is my market research on the issue. I took a trip to the local high end wedding gown shop and asked the 8 brides that came in during the hour I was there about this issue.
The question: "If you had the choice between perfect audio with you wearing a mic and fairly good audio without you wearing a mic, which would you choose?" I also showed them what they would wear (lectrosonics wireless). wear a mic = 0 not wear it = 8 That's enough for me! Mike |
March 2nd, 2006, 08:56 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 419
|
I say it like it is....take it or leave it but Gene needs solid advice here....not some wack opinions on where to place a mic. I work in television as a camera op and field sound besides the wedding stuff, so I know from much experience how to get the audio needed. How does leaving a bridesmaid to turn on your wireless set up hold merit....it doesnt, plain and simple....not to mention you are asking for serious trouble by doing so. Maybe he holds other good ideas, but that has nothing to do with the thread.
Gene....try what I explained earlier and I bet you will be happy with the results.....and your client(the bride) will be soooo happy she isn't stuck with wearing a wireless mic....GUARENTEED! Also....make sure you do not (coil) the slack of the lav cable....another no no...can give you audio issues, simply have the groom place it down his pants leg if possible....youll need some privacy for this part obviouisly. Quote:
|
|
March 2nd, 2006, 11:29 PM | #19 | |||
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durango, Colorado, USA
Posts: 711
|
Quote:
The fact is every working professional develops preferred methods of using the tools of their trade, usually based upon what they have learned gives them reliable results. Some pros learn how to be flexible and adaptable. Some don't. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Waldemar |
|||
March 2nd, 2006, 11:40 PM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Durango, Colorado, USA
Posts: 711
|
Quote:
Nonetheless, I really like the quality of sound I get with a mic placed as close to the source as possible, so I make the subject a point of discussion as early as possible, like when the contract is signed. At some point the bride makes a decision and, I accept that as final.
__________________
Waldemar |
|
March 3rd, 2006, 02:35 AM | #21 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
I would NEVER ask a bride to wear a mic, for several reasons.
#1 By mic'ing the groom and the officiant I will have 2 sources for the bride that I can boost in post for acceptable sound. #2 There aren't really any good ways with a bride to disguise the mic. Ace-bandaging a transmitter and using a bunch of white tape is an ingenius idea and would work really well for a movie of a wedding. However, a bride wants to look and feel beautiful on her wedding day, and I guarantee you that most brides (meaning the VAST majority) will not be interested in strapping on equipment. The idea for double-mic'ing the groom and adjusting the levels is a great tip, and I certainly would do that before I would slap a mic on a bride. |
March 3rd, 2006, 02:42 AM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
No bride slapping, that's for sure ...LOL.
Sorry Travis, I just couldn't resist. :) |
March 3rd, 2006, 02:57 AM | #23 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Bride slapping is a great way to get yourself into a new field of work though . . . . d:-)
|
March 3rd, 2006, 03:02 AM | #24 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
I guess that is one way to make a career move!
|
March 3rd, 2006, 03:10 AM | #25 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Or get yourself killed outright!
|
March 3rd, 2006, 03:11 AM | #26 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 419
|
yeah....the only reason i mentioned double mic'ing the groom is in the event the officiant wont allow himself.herself to be mic'd by us....and it has happened only once....the priest was not having a wireless mic on his body, dont know why as we didnt press the issue.....so we were forced to double mic the groom....and set levels differently for ea. the groom and bride/priest.....worked well.
Quote:
|
|
March 3rd, 2006, 03:25 AM | #27 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Another idea that can work for certain situations is to place the mic within the setting itself. For example, if the bride and groom are standing under a tent, you can tape your transmitter to one of the supports in the roof of the tent and let the mic dangle down so it is above the bride and groom.
|
March 3rd, 2006, 03:27 AM | #28 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 419
|
we've done similar...forgot to mention that one, good note travis.
Quote:
|
|
March 3rd, 2006, 03:33 AM | #29 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minnesota (USA)
Posts: 2,171
|
Wouldn't it make more sense to dangle a shotgun?
|
March 3rd, 2006, 10:18 AM | #30 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 190
|
I don't think a shot would work out. Unless it was a really unique situation it would be way obtrusive. Also, the shot won't get the audio you are after, it just picks up too much (coughs, cell phones etc)
Mike |
| ||||||
|
|