|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 16th, 2010, 10:39 PM | #31 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
No, but the nanoflash does... which is one major reason so many pros are gravitating toward it. Many of us were hoping for a firmware update from Sony that allows this. That would allow me to stop dragging out my Firestore, and shooting HDV every time I have to record a live event.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
February 17th, 2010, 11:48 AM | #32 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Posts: 118
|
Been reading with interest, ready to move but it is the price that is keeping me from doing it...
I love technology, love the latest thing but as everyone here feel a sense of fear at going tapeless. Saw some comments on RAID, I have a RAID 5 array that I use to store current files/projects/anything business related and I run it on a server. It is suprising how many PCs now offer RAID built in but be aware, these PCs only offer RAID 0 or 1 (or 0+1 as often known) RAID 0 is useless in terms of security, it only stripes the drives to make the PC perform faster. RAID 1 is full tolerance, it mirrors the drive, so this means you have to get for example 2 x 500GB identical drives and you will only have 500GB of storage. RAID 5 allows the drives to split the contents across multiple drives, typically if you had 4 200GB drives, you would have 550GB rather than 800GB of space as each drive contains a portion of the others. Now to do this you need to have a RAID card, and not just buy a PC that has RAID on the motherboard. Might be telling you something you already know, but I was a happy bunny when this was explained to me, hope it helps someone make a decision.... |
February 17th, 2010, 01:25 PM | #33 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
I don't understand what going tapeless has to do with RAID. Or maybe I am just missing something.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
February 17th, 2010, 09:08 PM | #34 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC Area.
Posts: 550
|
If you are shooting tapeless having RAID's is the best way to do it for security and speed.
__________________
Red Epic available for rent, starting at $500 per day, Scarlets, and Lenses available too. rentals.maddalenamedia.com |
February 17th, 2010, 09:23 PM | #35 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
So, if I am shooting on tape, RAID is not the best way to go for security and speed? Honestly, I don't call having my only copy of my files physically in the same machine secure at all. It can be faster. I'll grant that.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
February 18th, 2010, 04:29 PM | #36 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA.
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
|
|
February 19th, 2010, 07:57 AM | #37 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Belle Mead, NJ
Posts: 552
|
We took a major power hit during the last east coast snow storm. Multiple components in my PC got fried -even though I had a surge protector. I had my current project files backed up to 2 seperate drives but both were connected and and running at the time of the power surge. Needless to say I was very nervous that both drives may have been taken out. Fortunately that was not the case but going forward, one of my backups will be to a portable drive that I will disconnect when not in use.
|
February 19th, 2010, 11:50 AM | #38 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 883
|
I think that's a pretty good idea right there Art.
I'm still on tape, but I think when I do go tapeless, the best (and increasingly affordable as hard drives get larger and cheaper) way is to have a combination of: (1) Copy footage off cards to your editing computer which has say Raid 1 and 4TB physical storage, yielding 2TB working space. (2) Copy footage off cards to a removeable 500GB USB 3.0 drive which is put in storage until the project is complete. Now, I have no idea how big HDV/AVCHD etc files are because I still am on the 13GB/hr miniDV standard. haha. But, I'm just guessing 500GB would be enough to store all the raw files for a typical HD wedding project. If you can go smaller, then great. |
February 19th, 2010, 01:44 PM | #39 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
HDV is roughly the same as DV. That's why you can use the same tapes. AVCHD will be slightly less.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
| ||||||
|
|