|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 19th, 2009, 01:36 AM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
Video Noise in Low Light - 5D2 vs XLH1
While this is not a wedding reception, it is a very low light situation...
We were trying to get inside a live stage theatre to shoot and having trouble with access (politics). We were shooting some other scenes nearby with the XLH1, when we got a call saying that if we could be there in 10 minutes, we can get into the theatre. I was shooting local and could have gone back to get the 5d2, but thought the H1 could handle it, and the audio is so much easier. We rushed in and there was nobody to bring up any extra lighting (politics) so we shot a few quick takes just using the camera evf to set-up. Shot wide open. When I saw the footage - it was crap, and not at all usable. So I arranged to get back in 2 days later with the 5d2, and my 50mm f1.4. See for yourself. This is why when the lights dim at the reception - I pack up everything except for the 5d2.
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
December 19th, 2009, 03:17 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 689
|
Hi Ken,
What settings were the H1 set to? Frame rate? Gain? Shutter speed?
__________________
WeddingFilms.com>> |
December 19th, 2009, 09:18 AM | #3 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Turn your Sharpening down to 0 in your custom preset menu, that cleans up some of the noise. PS Were you expecting the H1 to be as good in low light and as low noise as the full frame 5D?
PS It's arguable that the H1 image is actually better exposed- the 5D has blown highlights all over the subject. |
December 19th, 2009, 09:58 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
I have to agree, I think the overall image out of the XLH1 in this instance is much better. The H1 image is much better exposed, the subject from the 5DM2 has blown highlights and crushed blacks, giving a much more limited range to work with. You are getting much more range with the H1. I shoot with both these cameras a lot. Sure the noise structure may be better with the 5DM2, but I feel you are loosing more than what you gain. The thing about the H1 is the vast image control you have to control these factors. And that shows here. |
|
December 19th, 2009, 04:41 PM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
In this case the example was to just illustrate the noise differences between the two and how it relates to shooting in low light at wedding receptions, a situation that I've never been able to effectively deal with when using the H1 without bringing in more light.
When these two scenes are viewed full size, the H1 footage is really not usable, because of noise - all over the image. I've taken to shooting the H1 with default settings. In this case, gain had to go all the way to auto, at a shutter speed of 30. The stage lighting is very hard, hence the blown highlights, and since the piece is set in a theatre, I thought it would work - but we ended up reshooting it from another angle which worked better.
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
December 19th, 2009, 10:52 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
Maybe the the excessive noise from the h1 will be more evident in this version of the clips.
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
December 19th, 2009, 11:04 PM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
I didn't see anything there a good noise cleaner couldn't make 100% better. Maybe not as clean as the 5D, but unusable is a pretty far stretch.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
December 20th, 2009, 01:02 AM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
Perrone, I should say, unusable 'as is'. I haven't used a noise cleaner but I've seen samples of Neat Video. I've had some wedding reception footage that was pretty ugly. What do you recommend?
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
December 20th, 2009, 01:16 AM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
What kind of computer are you on?
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
December 20th, 2009, 02:29 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 84
|
Neat Video is by far the best plugin for noise reduction, worth well more than the $100 it cost... Just buy it
|
December 20th, 2009, 03:32 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 689
|
Ditto that. Nothing compares.
__________________
WeddingFilms.com>> |
December 21st, 2009, 02:01 AM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
Still an old Dual Core e6600 with 2gb ram running Vegas 8.0c. Will be upgrading in the spring, though she chugs along ok if you don't get too many layers on the timeline and keep the fx down, and set 'er up to render when you're heading out the door.
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
December 21st, 2009, 08:09 PM | #13 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Quote:
If you were to expose the image similarly on the H1 it would hid a lot of the shadow noise you are seeing. Additionally you can get MUCH better low light performance by shooting in 24p (at a half shutter of 1/24th) and making adjustments to your black-level, black ped, and knee in the Custom Presets. In other words- yes the 5D is better in low light, and no the H1 doesn't have to look THIS bad. |
|
December 21st, 2009, 10:59 PM | #14 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
Glen,
I should explain that the lighting did change as the shots were 3 days apart and the people who were in the theatre the second time around specifically killed the lights on the back wall. The original post was really intended to show the 5d2 to shoot relatively clean in high ISO (3200), as I had been reading several posts about concerns of shooting high ISO on the 5d2. The reason I posted these particular shots to illustrate it was only because they matched (sort of) and I happened to have just shot them. In retrospect, I should have just set up a new shot and compared both cams. I happen to own, and love the H1. But as I mentioned in the original post, I was in a rush and really didn't have time to set the shot or the camera up optimally. I do appreciate the tips on setting up the H1 to better handle the low light because I do love and use the camera alot.
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
December 23rd, 2009, 01:18 PM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 656
|
Quote:
And Neat Video is mandatory for any NLE. Excellent product.
__________________
Panasonic HMC150/Canon A1/JVC HD1/Sony Vegas 8.0c |
|
| ||||||
|
|