|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 30th, 2009, 04:08 PM
|
#46 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 656
|
Peronne:
There have been some bummer Blu-Ray firmware updates every now and then. I updated my LG & lost the ability to play BD-R. Fortunately you can easily downgrade LG firmware. They have since released other "updates" none of which support BD-R. Granted, few in the consumer world play BD-Rs, but it dosent make sense to me and just makes BD distribution a tiny bit more difficult for no reason I can think of. Jeff
__________________
Panasonic HMC150/Canon A1/JVC HD1/Sony Vegas 8.0c |
|
|
|
November 30th, 2009, 04:22 PM
|
#47 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Ironically, my new BluRay player just came in at the office today. I can't get the friggin thing onto the internet, but it played my DVDs nicely. I'll be testing it later with some DVD9 material to see if that works.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
|
|
|
|
December 2nd, 2009, 03:49 PM
|
#48 | |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 2,231
|
Quote:
Sony is the main name associated with Blu-ray and they also happen to make all kinds of HD cameras. Why can't BD-R be ironclad in the spec of every player? Just like all of the them play 1080p24. It is a format and they are making all of these cameras for content creators and then killing them at the distribution level, just like DVD+R & -R One would think it would be better this time around. Makes all of these new cameras look like a bit of a farce if you don't know if your client can even play what you give them. The worst thing is that you do not know there is a problem until the client tries the finished product, then it is too late. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
