|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 17th, 2005, 09:39 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 150
|
Newbie question about White Balance
I am using the GL2 to do weddings and I was wondering about White Balancing. I have been letting the cam auto set the white Balance. My question is: should I set the W.B.? or is it better to let the cam do it? Some of my shoots have been a little yellow lately and I was wondering if this is from not setting the W.B. myself?
|
June 17th, 2005, 10:05 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 382
|
I never use the auto-WB (combined with auto-exposure, it can be baaad). I usually just switch back and forth between the indoor and outdoor presets as needed. I do keep white cards with me for custom white balancing if need (ie: weird flourescents or something), but don't really need them.
I go for as neutral an image as possible when shooting and adjust it after the fact.
__________________
PAL shooter in NTSC territory |
June 18th, 2005, 01:59 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 331
|
IMO manual white balance is always best if you can obtain it. Sometimes in a run-and-gun situation you may have to go with auto WB -- which is not bad on the GL2.
But you will get better, more consistent, results with manual WB. The best way to understand this is just test it out for yourself. Tape some footage with auto, tungsten (if indoors), and manual WB. Load into your NLE and compare results. Or at least view on a calibrated monitor, or TV. These kind of questions are best answered by experimenting yourself. Tape is cheap. Experiment, test, review and record results. |
June 18th, 2005, 08:25 AM | #4 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
|
|
June 18th, 2005, 09:37 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 331
|
The Kodak card will definitely work. But easier and cheaper you can buy a 2x3-foot white foam-core board from most any discount store like Wal-mart for about $2.00.
If you want to get fancy for a few dollars more, go to your local art supply store and pick up not only the white board, but also several boards in various shades of light-blue. Doing a WB to a light-blue card will give you an image that is warmer (redder) The bluer the card the redder the resulting image. This is probably not necessary with a GL2, but if you ever shoot with other camers (like Sonys), then you may prefer this. |
June 18th, 2005, 11:56 AM | #6 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
|
|
September 6th, 2005, 07:18 PM | #7 |
New Boot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South Amboy New Jersey
Posts: 22
|
Whit balance
Why do some people refer to red as warm when in fact it is cool on the color temp scale? Blue is warm and red is cool.
|
September 6th, 2005, 07:30 PM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 382
|
Quote:
However, if you white balance to one of these, you'll end up w/ the opposite: balancing to a red hue will cool down the image; balancing to a blueish hue will warm up the image. If you're refering to the physical attribute of the light wavelength, for all i know you could be right - but people generally don't think in terms of physics phacts. ;-)
__________________
PAL shooter in NTSC territory |
|
September 6th, 2005, 07:54 PM | #9 |
Wrangler
|
Matt,
In addition to what Patrick said, think about it this way. Red is (cooler) and Blue is (hotter) in terms of temperture of a flame. But, we usually associate cold to blue and hot to red, as in the indicators on water faucets, and in terms of describing the look of a picture. =gb= |
September 6th, 2005, 10:37 PM | #10 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 64
|
Quote:
|
|
| ||||||
|
|