|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 14th, 2009, 10:29 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 703
|
If the DJ is cooperative (they often control the lights) and doesn't put the reception into pitch black darkness, I go with natural lighting. Lots of nice shadows and cascading light on the guests, especially on the closeups.
John |
April 15th, 2009, 12:25 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 100
|
For the reception, I only light the head table and the podium. 2 x 750w Totas and 1 x 500w Omni. I put the Totas in the front facing the head table - nice and high, one tota is facing just the head table the other one is facing the podium and the head table. The omni light is behind the podium up against the wall - giving me hairlight on the speaker (some depth). I have the lights all wirelessly controlled so when I don't need them I just press a button. Once they are on the dance floor I just turn one tota around (just loosen one knob instead of turning the whole light around) and light the dance floor.
|
April 15th, 2009, 01:16 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Belle Mead, NJ
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
Art |
|
April 15th, 2009, 03:09 PM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 768
|
Quote:
|
|
April 15th, 2009, 04:43 PM | #20 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
IMHO anything over 100 watts per light is overkill for receptions and run the enhanced risk of appearing obtrusive. We use three 75 watt lights on dimmers and it's provided ample lighting for even the darkest caves also known as reception venues. :)
Of course I can't shoot with no gain with this lighting- often times I'm at 1/24th and +12db however it's better to max your camera out first and add enough additional light to get the image to pop rather than trying to light the camera basing it on an image a 1/48-1/60th with low gain. Bear in mind there's always a critical balance between image quality and perceived obtrusiveness. Both of them are paramount. If either of the two edged out the other in importance it would be unobtrusiveness. |
April 15th, 2009, 06:02 PM | #21 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
It does sound like alot but most of the venues that I get to shoot in are large. Im using a wireless light control by NOVA from Canadian Tire for like $30cdn but no dimming ability. |
|
April 15th, 2009, 06:21 PM | #22 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
But as long as you're getting the image quality that you need then your settings are fine. |
|
April 15th, 2009, 07:58 PM | #23 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Quote:
|
|
April 15th, 2009, 08:22 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia, pa
Posts: 705
|
Glen: are you shooting with the XHA1?
|
April 16th, 2009, 08:08 AM | #25 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 100
|
I'm using the A1, what about you?
|
April 16th, 2009, 05:42 PM | #26 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
XH-A1...yes.
|
April 17th, 2009, 07:54 PM | #27 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 689
|
Hey Glen,
I'm shooting with 2 x 75's and a 20 on a smaller stand for cake cutting of other remote locations. I'm at 24 fps and 1/24th for nearly the entire reception too. I'm able to shoot the dance floor with 6db and the PFVISION preset. I was at 12db with my previous preset. I'd love to try your preset though... |
April 18th, 2009, 05:29 AM | #28 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 692
|
i am about ready to ugrade my kit, not sure whether to add lowel omnis or some
fresnels. Fresnels look high end, so I may just go with those. this will be my first year using additional lighting for receptions. |
April 18th, 2009, 09:27 AM | #29 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,505
|
Quote:
Works wonders for me shooting with FX1's running about 9-12db gain. We still use on camera dimable lights for fill, when needed. And the combo of off camera with some fill lighting, really creates a nice image with good depth of field that's not flat like normal on camera lighting is. |
|
April 18th, 2009, 10:25 PM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hamilton Ontario
Posts: 769
|
Are you guys using halogen, or flourescent lighting??
|
| ||||||
|
|