|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 5th, 2009, 12:16 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5
|
Which way do I go? I Need camera help.
Ok so I have been shooting as a contractor for a company for a while and this year decided to start on my own. I currently have six jobs booked and talking to a few more. I shoot with a PD-170 but need to get more cameras. I can a) buy another pd-170 (used) and a vx2100 to get me going or b) sell my camera and buy 3 HD cameras. I am a big Sony man so I have been kind of looking at staying with Sony. I love the Z5U, but buying three of them plus other equipment is a little steep. I thought about buying one and then buying some lower priced cameras, maybe even used. Here is a list of cameras I could use some input on, also how will any of these cameras pictures match up.
Z5U, FX1000, V1U, FX7, A1U, Z1U, FX1 also how about the HD1000U? Thanks in advance for everyone's help and opinions. |
March 5th, 2009, 01:12 PM | #2 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dorset UK
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
Why buy three lower quality cameras when you only need two? So buy two better quality cameras like the EX1 or perhaps Z7U. Or an EX3 and a cheaper TR12 for pickup shots? Get well away from PD170's or VX2100's. Old hat for people coming into the business.It would be false economy and you would be forever playing catchup. |
|
March 5th, 2009, 01:13 PM | #3 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 689
|
Hi Adam,
I'd suggest two FX1000 and a smaller camera as a backup - something like the Canon HV20, 30 or 40. There are so many options right now and none of them is perfect for most people like the VX and PD used to be. So many recording format options, chip types and media choices. Its dizzying. Standardization just doesn't seem to be on the horizon. Quote:
|
|
March 5th, 2009, 01:34 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
What about one Z5 + 2 FX1000's - if the budget is there, they are basically the same sensor and optics, just might be confusing with similar feel, but some different features. If the secondary cams are unmanned or by "help", simpler is probably better anyway.
In the Sony nomenclature, Z is the "pro" version of the FX "prosumer" cam, same for the Z1/FX1, not sure why the V1/FX 7 didn't conform to that... If budget is really tight, might take a look at the new XR500/520 for multi-angle/backups, and one "big" cam. It'd be worth your time to peruse the dedicated threads/forums on DVi for these cameras to familiarize a bit with what users are reporting - the Z5/FX1000 is getting pretty good reviews, FWIW. It is of course the "newest" offering, with the others you mentioned being several years old now. |
March 6th, 2009, 03:29 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston USA
Posts: 90
|
I have to agree with Dave, Z5 + FX1000.
Or if budget doesnt permit, i would say Z1 + FX1. Check out the different Sony section on this forum to get a sense of the camera. DONT waste your money on the HD1000U. An hv30 would be alot better than that, even though the hd1000u is in the shape of a professional shoulder mount. |
March 6th, 2009, 04:17 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nicosia, CYPRUS
Posts: 1,080
|
If I were you I would get a Z5 plus FX1000 or the FX7 if budget is tight, but definitely the Z5 is a must.
Stelios
__________________
My Blog: http://steliosc.blogspot.com "I hope for nothing, I fear nothing, I am free" Nikos Kazantzakis |
March 6th, 2009, 09:37 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 302
|
I hear all you guys recommending the Z5 for weddings. What about the rolling shutter/during flash issue, or is this really a overstated problem? I too was considering a Z5 but hell everyone has me scared to death about the rolling shutter issue. Im now considering the HMC150. Your knowledge would be helpful.
Thank you |
March 6th, 2009, 09:59 PM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lyndhurst, NJ, USA
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
I thing more important draw back of during fast pans - the frames gets jittered (sp?). You have to pan slowly. With weddings it's not a problem since most of the work is based on smooth movement of the camera. But if you plan to shoot action/horror movies then it might be an issue. I guess you should test it out first before making final decision. |
|
March 6th, 2009, 10:24 PM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,414
|
Go HD, go with your budget, buy the best you can afford,
good luck.
__________________
I love this place! |
March 7th, 2009, 12:40 PM | #10 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
Quote:
As far as the "flash" problem, the partial exposures are a shock at first, particularly when you're trying to slo mo the footage. BUT as stated, most viewers won't notice (I'm seeing footage with partial frames all the time on TV in news or other footage), and it's a timing issue that determines whether you get partial or full frames and how much is affected... it can vary greatly. Then again, I've looked back on SD footage with CCD's, and flash didn't treat THOSE frames any too delicately either... just no "partials", instead the whole frame typically looked like poo, pixelization and scrambling galore... |
|
March 7th, 2009, 02:45 PM | #11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
Listen to guys that own these cameras not to guys that don't and i but you would get a positive answer every time. Go the Z5 or Z7 or Ex1 make sure your camera has XLR inputs christal clear audio is vital |
|
March 7th, 2009, 06:17 PM | #12 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Buford, Georgia
Posts: 23
|
"Everyone that complains about rolling shutter are the guys that don't even own one of these cameras."
Not so. I own an FX1000 and I despise the rolling shutter. I also own an HMC150. I'll take the HMC150 any day over the FX1000. I'm trying to sell the FX right now and it appears there's not much demand for it. It's a brand new camera and B&H will only pay $1600 for it. That says a lot about how "not so great" these Sony cameras truly are. |
March 7th, 2009, 09:05 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
How much you want for it? I think with the economy things are really tight, so used gear, particularly high end, isn't moving as well as it used to, but $1600 seems awfully low to me, like at least $1k low... that's 1/2 of list price, isn't it?
I'm sure the HMC150 is a nice camera, and may be better than the FX1000 (which IMO should have ditched the tape...), but the FX1000 isn't THAT bad a camera from what I've seen. FWIW, I've dealt with RS for a while, and while it's not terrific, it's not a deal breaker for most uses. And I've never had any complaints about it from clients/viewers. (and yes, it does bug me a little!) |
March 7th, 2009, 09:19 PM | #14 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lyndhurst, NJ, USA
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
|
|
March 8th, 2009, 06:21 PM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
Last edited by Robert Bec; March 9th, 2009 at 02:12 PM. |
|
| ||||||
|
|