|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 28th, 2008, 07:14 AM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nepean, Ontario
Posts: 18
|
LitePanels Micro Update
I used my LP Micro at a wedding on Saturday. The VX2000 is excellent in low light situations and with the diffuser and 1/4 warm filters I only had to use it at half power to get a nice glow. With the Canon WD58 wide-angle lense there was a soft hot spot at the wide end. A slight zoom fixed this. I used 2650maH rechargables and had no change in brightness after 2hrs.
I'm impressed! |
May 28th, 2008, 07:45 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hamilton Ontario
Posts: 769
|
Yeah, i've been wondering about these....
I'm currently using NRG beltpacks to power my 30watt light source...The cord is a big PIA... A huge hassle, especially when you go to tripod.. I'm waiting to see more feedback on these lights... |
May 28th, 2008, 09:34 AM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,609
|
I've been using one since they came out and love it. Search for some of my post's about it. I've got a freeze frame posted.
Yeah there's a little drop off on the edges with a WA lens attachment on my 170 but I can live with it. No more battery belts and no more hot light on the camera. Don |
May 28th, 2008, 10:05 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 54
|
I just ordered mine and will be using it this weekend. Can't wait!
|
May 28th, 2008, 11:36 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 176
|
Andrew - can you post a sample or a frame so we can see the results. I've been renting a LitePanel Mini and want to see how well the Micro would work out instead but no one rents one around here. much appreciated.
|
May 30th, 2008, 07:24 AM | #6 |
New Boot
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nepean, Ontario
Posts: 18
|
Wish I could Zach but I was shooting for a studio and don't have the rights.
|
May 30th, 2008, 07:45 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 176
|
bummer...thanks anyways
|
May 30th, 2008, 01:16 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,609
|
here's one. about 8 to 10 feet away WA lens attachment on PD170-1/60th@f/1.6 0 gain, lite is a little bit under full power with the diffusion filter and 1/4 warm on it.
Don Last edited by Don Bloom; August 26th, 2009 at 08:24 PM. |
May 30th, 2008, 01:53 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 193
|
Just ordered one today... hoping to try it next week. It seems great and hopefully it'll work for my purposes. Being a female in the business, I am just tired of lugging around the 15lb battery pack. That pic looks good though and I'm hoping this is my soltion! Thanks for sharing!
|
June 2nd, 2008, 01:38 AM | #10 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
I shot my 2nd wedding this weekend with the Micro. I love not having a battery pack and love that the light doesn't get hot.
However, I nearly lost my diffusion filer during the preps. It just fell out at some point. I know you can rig the filter holder with tape, but for a $300 light it should have a better design. One of my batteries also won't stay in its slot, but closing the battery door locks it in place. Again, for a $300 light the construction is not that impressive. I also found that adjust the angle on the light was a bit of a pain, and I felt like I had to be very careful so as to not break the light off. Once again ... $300 light. As for the light's performance. It seemed to work pretty well. I found it to work best when the subject was within 5 feet. Beyond 5 feet the difference that the light made didn't seem to be all that much. I did also notice that turning the dimming/on/off knob does nothing for the first 25% or so of the turn, then I get low to full light in the middle 50%, and the final 25% of the knob turn again does nothing. Is this normal??? Overall, I'm fairly happy with the light. I'm conflicted only by the fact that it costs $300 but feels like a light that should cost $150 or maybe less. I'm quite concerned that something is going to break before I get my $300 of use out of it. |
June 2nd, 2008, 05:22 AM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,609
|
BTW, I my camera rooled off a bench the past weekend with the LP on it. OH OH NO!!!! I don't have a clue as to why it happend BUT I will say that the camera was fine and 2) so was the lite. No damage-nothing wrong at all. It took a lickin' and kept on tickin'.
Now I don't recommend doing this at all an granted while it was the luck of the Irish (which I'm not but...) that kept me from having a major problem it did prove to me that the light is tougher than many think. I think the LED technology plus the LP name will keep the price pretty much where it is. Enjoy the light! Don |
June 2nd, 2008, 09:16 AM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 54
|
I used mine this weekend and I was happy with the results. I flipped it on only twice - during the bouquet toss and the couple getting into the limo at the end of the reception. Glad I bought it.
|
June 2nd, 2008, 03:16 PM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 253
|
I likes....
I have used mine for two wedding in the last 2 weeks and it certainly fits my needs. I shoot it with an XH A1 and an Hv30 and it works best with my A1. I say this because in darker receptions the Hv30 would probably benefit from a stronger light. I will probably purchase another at some point so that I can use 2 of them simultaneously. This might do the trick for the Hv30. I am swamped but will try to post a pic.
|
| ||||||
|
|