My First Super8 Wedding Film at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Wedding / Event Videography Techniques
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Wedding / Event Videography Techniques
Shooting non-repeatable events: weddings, recitals, plays, performances...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 2nd, 2008, 08:27 PM   #1
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manila
Posts: 317
My First Super8 Wedding Film

cross-posting from another forum ...

www.jmagbanua.com/vids/hannah_rob_super8.wmv

So I got the package from Pro8 through Fedex yesterday and wasted no time putting this video together. I was THAT excited.

I shot this on an Canon 814XLS, I had ten rolls during that wedding and used a total of eight. The first half was mostly ASA500 tungsten balanced (Fuji Eterna) and the remainder was asa 250. It is going to be fun and challenging learning what kind of film gives what kind of look.

I had a lot of fun shooting that day, perhaps primarily because I wasn't shooting in the capacity of an official videographer. The noise from the camera was not at all loud. Of course the first roll elicited laughs and smiles from my colleagues but they got used to it pretty soon.

This was shot on auto exposure. Looking at my footage, I started to figure out where I may use manual iris control (strong llight sources during the first dance).

The most difficult thing was focusing. I have yet to perfect the diopter setting. After a while, the viewfinder would dig in to my eyes (hurts!). I hope somebody can suggest a solution for this.

My camera is a LOT more expensive than what can usually be found on ebay. I was a first timer and I didn't want to gamble. I needed to know that my camera was in pristine condition. If the footage screwed up, I would know I was the one who screwed up. The cam came with a Tiffen owarming filter, a sparse manual, and foam all shipped in a nice pelican case. The cam also came from Pro8. It runs with 4 AAs and a small dry cell for the meter.

Although I have no basis for comparison, I found the transfer very very clean.

I just wanted to share how stoked I am for being able to actually shoot a product with the kind of grain, saturation, mood that I take pains to achieve with video. The "film clutter" wasn't even added, it was there in the first place.

Thanks for watching.
Jason Magbanua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2nd, 2008, 11:19 PM   #2
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 80
Hi Jason, I really enjoyed your video, it has some great emotion and a really nice feel to it--I especially like the footage about 1/4 into it, looks like you're shooting into a beveled mirror or something like that--very cool!
__________________
Vlad
http://www.vladfilms.com/
Vladimir Chaloupka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2nd, 2008, 11:23 PM   #3
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iloilo City, Philippines
Posts: 104
nice one sir jays! where the rotating shots used with a glide or you just walked around them? It clip really has a nice feel to it! ^_^
Raphael Jamil Pranga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2nd, 2008, 11:48 PM   #4
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 991
Hey great clip!

However, I wonder whether the Super 8 look can be simulated easily in post?

Perhaps it's due to the fact that the wmv is so tiny, I didn't really get a sense of a special image quality due to the super 8 film stock. Maybe it looks very different @ full res on a TV?
Yang Wen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 3rd, 2008, 12:01 AM   #5
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 178
Amazing!

Yang Wen, I doubt that 'feel' can be simulated in post =)
Ian Lim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 3rd, 2008, 12:03 AM   #6
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manila
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yang Wen View Post
Hey great clip!

However, I wonder whether the Super 8 look can be simulated easily in post?

Perhaps it's due to the fact that the wmv is so tiny, I didn't really get a sense of a special image quality due to the super 8 film stock. Maybe it looks very different @ full res on a TV?
You are correct. It's a totally different immersive experience when I watched it through a projector on a 106 inch screen.

I'm trying out different encode settings now for a better reproduction. Thanks for watching.
Jason Magbanua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 3rd, 2008, 12:07 AM   #7
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manila
Posts: 317
No glide Fiel, just ran around the couple. Thanks for commenting.
Jason Magbanua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 3rd, 2008, 01:22 AM   #8
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 86
Nice clip!

Were those transition flashes actually done using the film stock, or is that a piece from iStock?
__________________
Timothy D. Allen
http://www.tribaliris.com
Timothy D. Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 6th, 2008, 04:55 AM   #9
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 446
Jmag:

Very nice...I have the same camera. Will be shooting a wedding with it in a couple weeks. There is something about Super8 that makes it more intimate and obviously vintage looking. I know what you mean about the little eyepiece.

-John
__________________
John J. Moon
www.northernlightfilmworks.com - Event DV Top 25 Recipient
John Moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 6th, 2008, 09:29 AM   #10
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 3,840
Some advice on setting the diopter.

Aim the camera at the sky (preferably on a cloudy overcast day.) Set the lens to infinity. Rotate the diopter until you see the grain on the focusing screen pop into and out of focus, then back. You want the diopter set so that your eyes are focusson ON the screen - since that is where the image is focused. If the camera has a splt screen center point you will see that pop into focus.

Then it's set.

Super 8 look can be simulated in post by adding those qualities that make film look TERRIBLE. IE: Too much grain, jitter, scratches, dust etc. This usually creates the mental impression of "Oh, I remember how bad those old films looked in the garrage..." hence the nostagia factors.

The film latitude, color balance and gamma response are MUCH trickier to emmulate, (even if it's super 8) that's why there are whole forums dedicated to getting 'the film look' ;)

(Yeah I own a half dozen nice super 8 cams, projectors and editor/viewers... I can't bring myself to part with them.)


By the way,, I thought you did an EXCELLENT job cutting this piece together. Made me want to go out and shoot some film today.
Richard Alvarez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 6th, 2008, 06:48 PM   #11
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 487
Jason, as usual, your work was brilliant. On top of that, the film looked great.

A few questions for you, keeping in mind that I don't know anything about film.
Is Super8 recorded at 15fps or is that just the WMV compression? When the transfer house sent you the footage, was it SD or HD? Can Super8 even be transferred to HD or is there not enough resolution?

Thanks for sharing, Jason.
Chris Harris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 6th, 2008, 08:41 PM   #12
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 3,840
Super 8 is typically shot at 24 though most cameras will also have the option of shooting at 18, and then some form of 'slow mo' which can be anywhere from 48, 50 to 64 fps on some models.

EDIT: I see that Pro8 has just taken possesion of a new scanner and will be offering HD transfers for Super 8 and Max8 film. Way cool.
Richard Alvarez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 7th, 2008, 12:51 AM   #13
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Larkspur, CA
Posts: 378
I've been using Pro8mm for 2 years now. The transfers are fine but I've been a bit disappointed with seeing the footage (transfered to DV) on my HD editing monitor. So I'm REALLY interested in seeing how their HD transfer is going to look.

If you think about it it's amazing that the little 8mm film can hold up well at 1920 x 1080 - or not. We'll see. I've got some footage in the can (same camera as Jason) that will be transferred to HD shortly.

Jason- great footage. That's pretty sick for a first timer (meaning good).
Justin Ferar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 7th, 2008, 09:00 AM   #14
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 3,840
I think much will depend on which filmstock you shoot - regarding the HD transfer.

I don't know the EXACT dimensions, but I see to recall that the Super 8 Frame was roughly the same size as the standard 1/4 chip in most MiniDv cams. The new MAX 8 format, recuts the gate, so the frame is larger still.

Definitely keep us posted regarding the HD transfers.
Richard Alvarez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 7th, 2008, 11:22 AM   #15
New Boot
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 19
Turned out very nice. How was the film transferred to video, did you do that yourself? Looked very clean.
__________________
http://www.horizonprovideo.com
Jim OBrien is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Wedding / Event Videography Techniques


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:30 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network