|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 20th, 2010, 10:45 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Views: 3125
|
April 20th, 2010, 07:36 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 371
|
Great Video Travis.
I loved the opening of the plane and boat shots. I also enjoyed the cuts on the beautiful violin music. Good work :)
__________________
Jawad Mir / Cinematographer . Filmmaker Film Style Weddings http://www.filmstyleweddings.com Jawad Mir http://www.jawadmir.com |
April 20th, 2010, 09:18 PM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Hey Travis,
Nice work as usual. Why the high shutter speeds? Is that because of the brightness of the conditions? Loved the low shot of his sandals in the final fade out. A bit of understated humour that worked really well. Cheers.... |
April 20th, 2010, 09:34 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,414
|
hey Travis, how many cameras?
__________________
I love this place! |
April 20th, 2010, 11:55 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Jawad | Thanks for watching and for the comments! It was tough getting solid shots on the plane because it was a tiny plane and we were bouncing all over, lol.
Vito | The high shutter speed was actually a stylistic choice we made before we even packed our first bag. I really like the look that a higher shutter speed gives. It enhances the 24p look and adds a bit of hyper-realism ... you just don't want to overdo it. Funny thing is that the high shutter helped when we were outdoors, but made things more difficult (as expected) shooting preps inside and at the reception .. which was outside at night. Buba | We used 3 cameras total for most of the wedding, but everything you saw in the trailer was done with 1 or 2 cameras. We ended up using 4 cameras for the ceremony. |
April 21st, 2010, 03:43 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arta, Greece
Posts: 342
|
Very nice editing and the color especially at the opening shots is amazing.
__________________
"A successful wedding videographer is the one that offers for viewing some excellent videos and some boring videos, and gets positive reviews for both". |
April 21st, 2010, 06:36 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Too bad it's much more apparent on some shot than on others.
|
April 21st, 2010, 09:27 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 313
|
Very nice.
Some beautiful shots in there. I especially loved the low glidetrack shots. Great colour also. Thx for sharing. |
April 21st, 2010, 12:21 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Dimitris | Thanks for the comments. Glad you enjoyed it.
Vito | Well, that's kind of the idea. The higher shutter really enhances scenes with more motion in them, creating a somewhat 'excited' look for those scenes ... which is what we wanted. I'm sure you've seen this in some feature films. You'll have a scene with high action content that exhibits a higher shutter look, and then some non-action scenes that don't exhibit that look. John | Thanks for checking it out. The Glidetrack shot on the dock is one of my all-time favorites now. d;-) |
April 21st, 2010, 02:22 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Yes, Travis, I understand the look that high shutter speed gives. But I guess I wasn't being direct enough.
My point was that in your trailer, shots with similar amounts of motion exhibit the high shutter effect in widely varying degrees, so your attempt to add excitement is inconsistent. For example, the closeup of him tying his tie in comparison to her putting on her shoe. So for the viewer the intention is unclear. I left it wondering why some shots had it, and others didn't. I'm sure THAT's not what you wanted. Last edited by Vito DeFilippo; April 21st, 2010 at 02:23 PM. Reason: error |
April 21st, 2010, 04:31 PM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Vito | Thanks for clarifying, and I did understand your point. The fact of the matter is that there is more and faster motion in the tie shot than in the shoe shot, so it WILL look slightly different. The only way around that would be to somehow constantly adjust your shutter speed on the fly to try and match the speed of the motion that's happening in front of you ... and that's just completely impractical in a live event situation. Even if you shoot at 1/48 shutter you will see the difference in a shot with a lot of motion and a shot with little motion .. if you're shooting 24p that is.
Also, in my opinion, I think your concern about the intention being unclear to the viewer is unwarranted. The higher shutter speed choice was simply to achieve a more stylized look, and I feel we succeeded in that. Having that look vary slightly between shots because of varying levels of activity is totally expected and normal ... and certainly doesn't take the viewer out of the experience .. at least not in my opinion. If I wanted to I suppose I could say that the elevated 'energy' in the tie shot directly translates to the fact that it took the groom a half-dozen times to get it right, so the extra 'energy' in the shot represents the very real agitation he was feeling at the time. I wouldn't say that, because it's not something I planned in advance and I can't take credit for the added meaning, but it IS what happened. d;-) Either way, I think maybe you're over analyzing the trailer a bit. I'm totally open to critique and opinions, and I'm not trying to shut you down, but I really just don't see any issue here. Maybe my eyes are just sun-blind still from the Bahamian sun. d;-) |
April 21st, 2010, 08:11 PM | #12 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,585
|
Actually, it was the shoe shot that exhibited the high shutter more clearly to my eyes....
Anyway, I'm done. Thanks for sharing your clip. I enjoyed it. |
April 21st, 2010, 10:20 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
I hope I didn't offend you at all, Vito. That definitely was not my intention. I just didn't see the issue I guess. Anyways, thanks for watching and for sharing your opinion. I do appreciate it.
|
April 23rd, 2010, 04:10 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 622
|
hi Travis,
Hope you don't mind me having some critiques here as well! Here is what I thought about your work: 1. Love the intro with the whole plane, boat thing 2. Dislike the text "journey begins" and all but thats a matter of preference. I would probably put something like serendipity studio presents + their name or something 3. I think the zipping bride gown looks staged. 4. putting shoe looks too long and its not really a nice shoe and she looks kinda putting it on in a hassle. 5. the bridge shots were shot in the wrong xy line. you cut back and forth with crossing the line each time makes the viewer a bit confused. one shot the groom is on the left, next shot the groom is on the right. 6. I would probably love to see the person speaking the voice over at the start (just a short shot of him) to let me know why and where he's saying those words. 7. I would probably have the bridge meeting to intercut with the whole bridal prep shots so that it doesn't look so obvious that it was shot in a wrong xy line. and it might look more sophisticated as well :) There you go, the critiques are purely honest and constructive and they are from my personal point of view. Santo
__________________
If a picture is worth a thousand words, what about motion picture? website: www.papercranes.com.au | blog: www.weddingvideosydney.net |
April 23rd, 2010, 11:28 AM | #15 | |||||||
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Santo | Please always feel free to provide a critique. I'm a big boy and I promise I won't ever shed any tears. d;-)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So we took advantage of the faster tempo to set the stage for the journey with the plane/boat shots, and then to capture the energy that is always present in the preps. Then, as the music dropped in tempo we switched to the very intimate moment of the first meeting. I really feel that if we had tried to mix the meeting with preps we would have lost a lot of impact overall. With a different piece of music, I think the results might be different, though. Anyways, hopefully that gives you some insight on our decisions. I think you had some good points and I definitely appreciate you sharing all of them. Thanks! |
|||||||
| ||||||
|
|