|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 14th, 2009, 02:23 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Views: 4560
|
December 14th, 2009, 02:31 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 313
|
Glen, that is superb, absolutely beautifully shot and edited and a great song!
Really liked the use of shots and flow of this piece. Fantastic! Cheers, John De rienzo. |
December 14th, 2009, 03:18 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 768
|
Glen... Beautiful work. Obviously talent is spread throughout your family.
I have recently been in contact with a bride that I don't think my "low light abilities" suited her needs. I passed along a great recommendation to you and your crew. I hope you don't mind. I just think highly of your work. Steve |
December 14th, 2009, 03:19 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arta, Greece
Posts: 342
|
Well, Glen, what can I say? It's well known that you are a top name in the wedding industry, but you should look into the music video industry very seriously after this one. Because this is definetely a mind-blowing work! It's not only superbly shot and edited like John said (to a point that I could hardly believe this is your first one) but you've got the emotional aspect of the song 100% ! And this is the important thing for me because I may get impressed often with various video works I watch around the Net, but I rarely feel emotions like the ones coming from your video (last videos that did that for me were Pacific Pictures' "Snow" and Robert Balasko's "Gupsy Wedding").
If you feel mighty proud of this work, you are absolutely right. This one is ready for the big music stations.
__________________
"A successful wedding videographer is the one that offers for viewing some excellent videos and some boring videos, and gets positive reviews for both". |
December 14th, 2009, 03:53 PM | #5 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Quote:
Low light abilities? Don't you shoot with the same cameras as me? |
|
December 14th, 2009, 03:54 PM | #6 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Hey John, thanks for taking the time to watch and comment, and thank you also for the comment/like on Vimeo! Much appreciated.
|
December 14th, 2009, 04:02 PM | #7 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Quote:
Thank you for the compliments about the quality of this piece. It was nice not being confined by the difficulties of live events without retakes. There were several aspects of this production that gleaned light on my lack of experience. For one it was overshot tremendously. I shot both performance scenes (piano, and field) ten times! I used various, glass, angles, and varied movement with static/locked-down shots. That came to bite me in post when I realized syncing up ten 1080p angles in multicam was quite a chore for me AND the computer! I did, however, find that the new 422 (proxy) worked perfectly for this. Again thank you so kindly for your comments. Now I'm off to check out your aforementioned videos! It sounds like we are on the same page in regards to our taste! PS I would love to expand beyond weddings. I truly enjoy actually having control during shoots. However I must say this is the first project where the majority of the work was BEFORE post! |
|
December 14th, 2009, 04:40 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kingscliff, Australia
Posts: 196
|
Awesome work Glen. Production value absolutely through the roof.
Thanks for sharing this piece and also what it was like producing your first music video as a whole. Was very interesting to hear your thoughts on the experience vs. live events. Cheers, MB. P.S. I think I remember seeing a still shot of the heavy lifter above the pianist so was good to see the final shot! |
December 14th, 2009, 05:14 PM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arta, Greece
Posts: 342
|
I forgot to ask before Glen. What camera did you use?
__________________
"A successful wedding videographer is the one that offers for viewing some excellent videos and some boring videos, and gets positive reviews for both". |
December 14th, 2009, 05:39 PM | #10 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Quote:
Matt, thanks for watching and commenting man. |
|
December 14th, 2009, 05:46 PM | #11 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,898
|
Quote:
Lenses used were: 50 1.2, 85 1.2, 135 f2, 24-70 2.8. Other gear: Cinevate Pegasus Heavy-Lifter, Redrock Micro Field Bundle NLE & Software: Final Cut Pro 7, Magic Bullet Looks. Other notes: Edited offline using ProRes 422 (proxy) and colored online with ProRess 422 (HQ). Probably overkill (re: HQ flavor) but I figured it couldn't hurt especially since I was shifting the huges pretty strong in some shots. The 422 proxy footage just fell apart, as it should I suppose. |
|
December 14th, 2009, 06:01 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arta, Greece
Posts: 342
|
I think that after my objections on the use of DSLRs for events and other stuff, I will say that I was -somewhat- wrong and I will buy a couple of 7Ds in the very near future. Because we too are thinking to experiment with music videos and were thinking between a DSLR or EX1. I think the Canon offerings win in some important departments.
Also, I shouldn't forgot to mention that your cousin is a very talented musician. Congratulations to her also, I will surely check her Itunes page after this one.
__________________
"A successful wedding videographer is the one that offers for viewing some excellent videos and some boring videos, and gets positive reviews for both". |
December 14th, 2009, 06:24 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
Great stuff, Glen. Especially loved the change in color grading between scenes to reflect the different moods.
Dimitris, you might want to research the 7D more. Quite a lot of people are expressing dissatisfaction on the 7D versus the 5D for certain issues; overheating (seems to be the top concern), image sharpness, low-light performance, overall image quality, cropped sensor. I heard that Canon is coming out with a 24p update for the 5D, which could make it a no-brainer for some people. |
December 14th, 2009, 06:28 PM | #14 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,200
|
Hey Glen,
That was a very nice piece and cool that you could produce it with a relative. As the parent of an adopted child, I found the piece really very moving. I hope you find an audience for it.
__________________
C100, 5DMk2, FCPX |
December 14th, 2009, 06:35 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arta, Greece
Posts: 342
|
You're right about all that Travis. I've done a bit of a research on those Canon models and I am aware about the problems, the most important being the overheating one. I still don't get it how Canon put on sale a camera with such a problem. Regarding low light, although inferior to 5D, it surely will be vastly superior to my FX1s. The advantages I see on buying 7D instead of 5D are
a) price difference, especially if you go for more than one b) already own some lens that are compatible with the 7D c) 50p is an excellent option if you use slow motion in your videos (we like it, though some would say it's out of fashion :) ) We're still thinking about it. But I won't lie, main reason is the price of 5D.
__________________
"A successful wedding videographer is the one that offers for viewing some excellent videos and some boring videos, and gets positive reviews for both". |
| ||||||
|
|