|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 20th, 2009, 02:39 PM | #1 | |||
|
||||
Views: 1317
|
March 20th, 2009, 08:36 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 64
|
Hi Stephen,
I like your creativity on this clip. Quite original. I thought it was a little long and maybe that's only because of the couple, they didn't seem to really want to talk about their relationship. Thanks for sharing..nice cutting!
__________________
Terry Taravella studiovc.com & infocusvideoevent.com |
March 20th, 2009, 09:50 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 2,933
|
This was great because it was entertaining. It didn't really reveal much honest information about the couple, but it did show their personalities well .. and also showed off how they enjoy having fun with each other. Lighting was pretty good and editing was great. Thanks for posting!
|
March 20th, 2009, 11:51 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MOSCOW
Posts: 860
|
Than was fun to watch, I am sure fun to make. Liked the angles, tightness of some shots, editing, it's a bit long I thought, cutting it shorter would help, IMO.
Thanks for sharing, great idea to work with B&G in a studio! Also looks like is a great product for for a wedding anniversary to offer. |
March 21st, 2009, 01:02 AM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 1,997
|
I'll echo the "a bit long" thoughts, but I really liked watching that. The lighting was very good and the fun shots of the couple (especially them dancing in the BG of the other person) were hilarious.
|
March 21st, 2009, 02:56 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toowoomba, Australia
Posts: 370
|
Hey Stephen,
I'd also suggest that shortening this clip will make it punchier. With the funky cutting you've done already if you could get it to about 1 or 1.5 minutes it'd really rock. Pull out the great soundbites and ditch the rest - go for less is more. Not sure if it's just my headphones but the talking only seemed to be in the left channel. If you really want to rock this clip up, a band called Quietdrive does a cool version of 'Time After Time' - the version you've used is a bit too musak. With a bit of improvement and refinement you'd really be onto something here, it's a great idea to offer to couples. Cheers, Matthew.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------- www.shadowplay.com.au --- www.shadowplay.com.au/blog |
March 21st, 2009, 09:44 AM | #7 | |||||
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 768
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
March 21st, 2009, 11:48 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 768
|
Ok... as everyone mentioned I shortened the video by about a minute and some change... Please let me know if it's better then the original. I was trying my best to keep the flow. not sure if i was able to accomplish my goal though.
Justin and Jeanette on Vimeo matthew... I loved the song you mentioned and wish I would have known of it sooner. To keep on timely schedule I had to reuse the other version :-( |
March 21st, 2009, 06:28 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toowoomba, Australia
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
It's definitely better so well done. I still think you could cut another 30 seconds or so out of it. I'd suggest going through it again with an eye towards being absolutely ruthless. Cut out any unnecessary pauses and lines in the talking. i.e. When the guy says "It was a hot day <pause> but I was in love" or something like that. Cut the "hot day" line and just keep the "in love" line. There's a few other lines like that that could be tightened up. The last 'strangling' bit, for me, takes away from the love a bit. Hope that helps. Cheers, Matthew.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------- www.shadowplay.com.au --- www.shadowplay.com.au/blog |
|
| ||||||
|
|