|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 28th, 2009, 01:24 AM
|
#1 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Coast - NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,606
|
what does it all mean to my eyes
Theres been a lot of discussion on different monitors and I really need an external monitor for my less than sharp old eyes.
The Manhatten 8.9" HD Pro Monitor HD089B has a resolution of (1024x600) The Small HD monitor (when it actually appears) will be 8.9" 1280x768 native The Marshall V-LCD-70P is an 8.4" 800x480 My question is - will I really notice the difference between the Marshall and the other 2? While the Marshall is more expensive, it has a peaking filter which will really help me with accurate focus (I think) If there really is a significant difference to the viewer, I might wait for the SmallHD to actually appear. what do you think? |
|
|
|
March 28th, 2009, 06:20 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All over, USA
Posts: 512
|
lies, damn lies and statistics
|
|
|
|
|
March 29th, 2009, 07:16 PM
|
#3 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Coast - NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,606
|
While I agree with your sentiment entirely .. I was hoping for some more constructive comment.
any old farts out there who can clearly see the difference between a 800x480 and a 1280x768? I've tried altering the res on my monitor and that certainly changes the clarity of the image to me, but is that a fair test? |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
