|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 10th, 2007, 02:33 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
Please recomend an HD TV!
Hi, I'm interested in getting a 32 or 26ish inch HD TV. I'll probably get a PS3 to go with it. Could anyone recomend something? I'd like to spend around $600, and I'm looking at Samsung.
Some people say I should wait a year till they are 1.3 instead of 1.2 -whatever that means. Any recomendations will be appreciated! |
December 10th, 2007, 06:00 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington, NorthWest USA
Posts: 788
|
Hi Aric.
I would recommend the Vizio 32 inch LCD HDTV. Its got a lot of nice features, and is in your price range. I own this TV, and a friend of mine just got one for himself due to being so impressed by it. Good luck. ~Gabriel
__________________
Gabriel Photography |
December 11th, 2007, 12:21 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 209
|
|
December 12th, 2007, 12:03 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
|
December 12th, 2007, 07:34 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,414
|
Just in case anyone wanted to read about 1.3
The Vizio seems to be a great TV... I haven't heard any complaints on it... |
December 13th, 2007, 10:58 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
Do you have a link or something?
Vizio sounds good, one thing I forgot to mention is that motion is the most important thing to me (next to $). Does the Vizio handle motion well? I want to avoid jitter/stutter/strobing type stuff. |
December 15th, 2007, 08:26 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
I ended up getting a 32" Sharp aquos. I talked best buy down to $699. But I got in a fight with the salesman, cause he showed me an SD 16:9 picture all squished and distorted (circles were fat ovals). When I fixed it, he told me there was something wrong with my eyes and my brain -that guy must've been blind.
The selling point for me was the 6ms refresh rate. |
December 15th, 2007, 08:53 AM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Deep South, U.S.
Posts: 1,526
|
Aric,
Nice buy. I paid $200 more last year. I think you are really going to be happy with it. DVDs look great. The only downside IMO is that channel changing is slow. But, I have gotten used to it.
__________________
Mark videos: http://vimeo.com/channels/3523 Stock: http://www.pond5.com/artist/mark29 |
December 15th, 2007, 09:22 AM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,290
|
What DOES 1.3 mean?
|
December 15th, 2007, 10:23 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
|
December 15th, 2007, 11:39 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 70
|
check out this link for the answer and MORE information on HDV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI ken |
December 21st, 2007, 11:04 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 616
|
I think best buy ripped me off. Two people there told me I could use the 1.3 hdmi cable. I bought it, but I saw some specs for the 32" sharp aquos and it said it supports 1.2!
Should I return the cable? Can I utilize the 1.3 with these TV? |
December 21st, 2007, 12:30 PM | #13 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,290
|
Quote:
|
|
December 21st, 2007, 04:53 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 209
|
Bit depth and lip sync. But you are right, there is no benefit for currently available TVs, players and, more importantly, movies. AFAIK, all movies use 8 bits per color per pixel.
|
| ||||||
|
|