September 14th, 2006, 12:20 AM | #76 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15th, 2006, 11:18 AM | #77 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 320
|
I have a F100 head en route from EVS right now. Also arriving today are the legs and 516 from B&H, so I'll be sure to do a trial w/ both of them to see how they compare.
EVS had two left in stock when I called. Unfortunately their shipping costs are a touch high (around $80 for 3-day). Then of course two days after I order, B&H has them in stock again (from whom I could have saved $75). That's life I guess. At least EVS was 5x more of a pleasure to work with over the phone than B&H. Does anyone know where to get an extra pan bar for this head? Would this work: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...goryNavigation Or how about this: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...goryNavigation Thanks for your help. I think this tripod will be the last I need to buy for quite some time. |
September 15th, 2006, 11:39 AM | #78 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Quote:
It's the 526 (which was formerly sold as 510). It has 3 drag click stops for each pan and tilt, and it changes "gears" (fluid cartridges) just like a Sachtler. I have one, if on a budget it's the only Bogen that I can say is passable.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
|
September 15th, 2006, 01:28 PM | #79 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 350
|
That 526 does sound nice, but it's pretty expensive! At B&H the head only is almost $1500. Maybe they've raised the prices since you got it Nate. At the $1500 level I would definitely encourage looking around at the other brands, since even among high-end heads they all feel and operate slightly differently.
Chad, you might want to call up the USA Cartoni distributor (Ste-Man in L.A. 818-760-8240) to confirm the right pan handle. If I remember right, the pan handle attachment point (the rosette) on the Focus isn't the same size as their bigger heads and Cartoni's rosette isn't necessarily compatible with those from Bogen or any other brand. |
September 15th, 2006, 01:53 PM | #80 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
|
Quote:
I think my post was more along the lines of "eh, Bogen makes like, *1* good head!"
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net |
|
September 15th, 2006, 06:59 PM | #81 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamden CT
Posts: 470
|
Well, I've had a Bogen 503 for a year. I can say, as of right now, I hate it. The stiction on pans and especially tilts, when zoomed in, is horribly noticable. There is no setting to get rid of it unless it is completely loose.
|
September 21st, 2006, 09:34 AM | #82 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 320
|
516 and Focus compared
Ok, so I have both heads with me now. I have to send one back, but I'm still a little on the fence as to which that will be.
I have some concerns about the Focus head. It doesn't seem that it can be fully balanced at all angles. I've played with it for quite some time and in order to get any balance I need to mount it in an awkward way with the plate on the other side of the emergency stopper. In this way it hangs half way off the head... Any ideas on how to fix this? -A longer mount plate? What about rod supports? The HD100 is a really back-heavy camera w/ the pro batts. No matter what I try, it will not hold still at all angles. I can balance it for a good functional range, but not everything. Also the pan bar is very flimsy. The Bogen head has rock solid bars (x2) and the Cartoni came with just one chopstick-like bar, which has a large amount of play in it, especially when extended. I still can't find any replacement handle online. The handles for the Delta heads are around $170. Over all I'm feeling a bit under-whelmed by the Focus -especially for the price. My expectations were maybe a little too high. The action is very strong and smooth -better than the 516. It doesn't spring back slightly when you come to a stop like the 516, and it’s easier to get a smooth pan. And since all that matters really is what the camera sees, I'll probably stick with the Focus (if I can figure out a solution for the mounting plate). But for look and feel, the 516 is a more solid build to me. At least the QR plate is long enough to balance this camera. It's basically like comparing a great prosumer head with a not-so-great professional head. At least that's the feeling I get. Any thoughts? |
September 21st, 2006, 01:14 PM | #83 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 180
|
i'd like to echo the sentiments made by Jiri, Mike, and Richard. I own a Bogen 501 head, have so for years. I don't like it. I find it's pretty near impossible to make smooth corrections from a stand-still without a jerk at the start.
In 2005 I went to NAB. If you've never gone, go, its really great. Anyway, I tried every tripod I could that would be suitable for my Canon XL2. I've found that the best way to test a head's smoothness it to try making small corrections from a still postion, and zoomed in if you really want to torture test it. Long story short, Bogen was the worst, Miller Arrow 30 was the best (I tried the Arrow 30 with an XL2) and by far the most expensive ($5199). One thing I found was that there wasn't much inbetween that I felt would really work for me. Keep in mind though for slow, small corrective movement, I like a fairly heavy amount of resistance, so someone who likes a really loose feel might have found more tripods to their liking. A light feel is great IF you can pull off the smooth movement that you need. It's been over year since then, but I finally chose to upgrade my tripod, and I ordered the Miller Arrow 30 (waiting for it to be shipped). It's movement was flawless, and I actually found that the most resistance I wanted still wasn't the highest resistance setting on the head. Now this may seem like overkill, but I just wanted to end game the tripod situation, and I felt that it was worth the investment. I think that a tripod can almost be more important than the camera. This will sound silly, but I shot a video about horse riding, and used a Sachtler Video 20 tripod, with a Canon ZR10! All my tracking, panning shots were nice and smooth, and the client was really happy with the final product! Don't get me wrong, I love my XL2, but I think the sticks that you put under your camera can be just as important as anything else in the production, but again, that's only if you're the type of shooter that likes steady shots. There's lots of creative, effective, handheld work being done out there, which can really work. |
September 21st, 2006, 01:34 PM | #84 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 350
|
Quote:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=69072 Quote:
But even if money was no object, one problem with getting a professional head is most of them are designed for ENG cameras so they won't balance a smaller, lighter camera. Cal, how were you able to operate the ZR10 on that Sachtler Video 20? I think the lightest spring setting on that head is 22 lbs. Were you just fighting the counterbalance spring? |
||
September 21st, 2006, 02:12 PM | #85 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
|
|
October 6th, 2006, 09:18 AM | #86 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 158
|
JVC GY-HD100 Tripod Mount
I was looking on the JVC website and one of the accessories listed was the KA-551U tripod adapter. My question is can I mount the camera on a tripod without the $300 adapter?
__________________
Northweststockfootage.com Shooting 100% HD Washington, Oregon, and Soon British Columbia |
October 6th, 2006, 10:02 AM | #87 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 247
|
Yes. I mounted mine on a bogan 503 head just fine.
|
October 6th, 2006, 10:02 AM | #88 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellsboro, Pa
Posts: 285
|
Yes, you can. The tripod plate is a nice quick release, and allows you to balance the camera a lot better.
For bigger tripods, it's a must-have. I don't think I could mount the camera on my Miller 25 without that plate. |
October 18th, 2006, 09:21 AM | #89 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 101
|
I had experience with the 516 head, 3191 legs, and 501 head
I have had a continuing relationship with Bogen tripod products, in stills and video realms, for many years.
I got the mini and micro fluid heads and respective legs to hold smaller cams when shooting vhs. When I got a heavier pro camera weighing 25 lbs, I tried a used Miller 20 head and Bolex legs. I eventually sold all of it. Then I had a 20 lb pro SVHS cam and got the 3191 legs and 516 head. The load was just over capacity, and there was enough play in the system to make it visible on screen unless I moved things, pan or tilt, very gingerly. There was not enough counterbalance force to prevent nose over. There may have been enough with a lighter and smaller cam, and I credit the design for having somewhat variable counterbalance force. But it lacked compared to a higher end Sachtler or similar. I sold the camera and that tripod system and got a PD 150 and eventually a Bogen 501 head for my older aluminum legs. I know for a fact that the 501 and other Bogen heads are not real fluid in the sense of an O'Connor, Sachtler, or Cartoni from having disassembled them to replace the grease. They contain concentric staggered rings which create a fluid effect when the grease acts as a lubricant between them. The pan part is a simple cylinder in housing with similar grease. |
October 20th, 2006, 12:13 PM | #90 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 14
|
I'm interested in getting the tripod plate, but haven't seen one for the HD100U in person. Does it work like other ENG plates in the fact there is metal attachements that are fixed to the bottom of the JVC and then the camera clicks into place on the plate? Or does the HD100 as is fixate itself onto this plate?
|
| ||||||
|
|