May 29th, 2006, 03:11 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
Which tripod are you using with your A1/HC1/HC3?
Which tripod are you using with your camera? If you are using a combination of tripod legs and head, please list both items. Why did you choose for this tripod, and how does it work in the field? What the pro's and con's?
I am currently looking for a tripod but I am not sure what to pick. I am currently looking at the 755b tripod in combination with a 503 or 701RC2 fluid head. But I have also heard very good reviews of $40 Velbon tripods. So I am kinda lost to say so. I hope you can help me. Just list your tripod/tripod combination and how you would rate it! |
May 29th, 2006, 06:52 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 61
|
Tripod: Manfrotto 755B MDeVe
Head: Manfrotto 503 An excellent mid-range combo priced between the the casual user gear and the professional user gear. |
May 29th, 2006, 07:29 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 177
|
Tripod - Bogen/Manfrotto 3221WN Wilderness Tripod - From my DSLR days. very very sturdy and great for indoor and outdoor with the screw out spikes if needed outdoors
Head - Bogen 501 Pro Fluid tripod head. On another note: I use the Bogen 521pro LANC Remote which is great. |
May 29th, 2006, 08:15 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 138
|
I use this Daiwa VT523 (http://www.slik.com/daiwa/vt/vt523.html), but also sometimes a cheap Hakuba tripod.
The Daiwa is very nice, good build quality, smooth fluid head. A bit too heavy to take everywhere. The Hakuba is much more transportable, but doesn't allow independent control of pan & tilt. I also have a Spiderbrace, that is lots of fun in the field. |
May 29th, 2006, 09:37 PM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Posts: 202
|
Quote:
|
|
May 29th, 2006, 09:46 PM | #6 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
I agree Jeff. I still may end up going that route, but I have not run into an issue as of yet. Definately a sturdy tripod |
|
May 29th, 2006, 10:45 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 138
|
Whatever you do, get a *video* tripod, not a photo tripod. A levelling mechanism (ball, clamp, spirit level) is very, very handy. Much better than trying to fiddle with the legs.
|
May 29th, 2006, 11:05 PM | #8 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30th, 2006, 01:09 AM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
Quote:
Also, how comfortable is this combination to carry around? Do you have a softcase for the tripod or how do you carry it? |
|
May 30th, 2006, 01:11 AM | #10 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30th, 2006, 04:16 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 119
|
Budget option..
I have a Velbon DV-7000. It sounds too cheap to be any good ($110 at B&H, complete with fluid head), but it is excellent value. To me, the head felt similar to use as the Manfrotto 701RC2. A UK based video editing magazine (Digital Video Techniques) just did a review of various tripods, and rated the DV-7000 over the Manfrotto 701RC2 with 755B legs (which costs over 3 times as much). Now that is just one review, and I’m not saying that is indeed better, but it does validate my own findings, that the DV-7000 is very good at a low price. It is however heavy (7.5 pounds), so not good if you will be carrying it around for long distances. |
May 30th, 2006, 04:23 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 993
|
I ordered a Velbon CX-570 at BH Photo Video yesterday. For $39,95 I reckon it will always be worth the money. I have heard some great things about this tripod, from people who are using it for over a year. I am just starting with filmmaking, and although I am tempted to to for the best, I decided to go for something with a high quality/price relationship.
I often encounter people with almost no experience, no knowledge about basic techniques or whatsoever, with the most expensive gear. I have learned with my D-SLR (Nikon D70) that the most expensive gear does not always work better. I shot some images that were classified as D2 by some people. I am reading some books on documentary filmmaking and cinematography and all these books tell you that content, storytelling and technique is far more important than $800 pieces of equipment. I really like Manfrotto (used it with my D-SLR), but at this moment, I am so divided between all the products they are offering that I have decided to get some practice in the field with the Velbon, and on the basis of my evaluation of that tripod, I will make a choice for a new tripod. And maybe, it will turn out that the Velbon is all I am asking for and more. But keep this thread going, I really like it to which equipment people are using and why they have chosen for a specific tripod/combination. |
May 30th, 2006, 04:08 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 107
|
Is it me or are tripods overrated and expensive?
I've used heavy duty, expensive pods before, but recently picked up a cheap tripod for my A1U -- $20 at Fry's. And guess what? It works great, since the A1U weighs about an ounce. I just can't justify spending a bundle on a tripod anymore. I'm well past the point of trying to impress anyone. |
May 30th, 2006, 04:20 PM | #14 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Posts: 202
|
Quote:
|
|
May 30th, 2006, 07:01 PM | #15 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 105
|
Sony VCT-D680RM with remote control pan handle, and a 10 to 15 pound lead shot bean bag to "anchor that sucker" when needed.
Jamie |
| ||||||
|
|