January 13th, 2014, 05:51 PM | #61 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Quote:
Quote:
From other research I've done since starting this thread, it seems that for a single person crew, shooting wildlife, single leg tripods are the most common type used. The flexibility of operation far outweighs the slight increase in windup. And I can think of some of the situations that I get my current tripod in that a normal MLS video tripod would not be able to cope with. I'll try to get the Australian store to offer to take the Miller system back if I find it unsuitable. If so, then my only risk is the freight cost. The Miller system I'm looking at gets reasonable reviews: Miller SOLO DV10 Carbon Fiber Tripod System 1511 B&H Photo Video |
||
January 13th, 2014, 08:24 PM | #62 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Here is a thought. One of the reviewers of the Miller system (on B&H site) that downgraded his opinion over time is in Denver. If he was willing (and it might be useful to him as well), I would offer to loan him one of my Gitzo / Sachter systems for a week or two (or three) and see what he says.
I had been contemplating sending Chris S. one of my systems for a DVInfo review but that will probably not happen soon enough, and I have no idea if Chris S. would even be interested. Let me know if this is of interest. (Disclaimer - I have nothing to disclaim. I am just a user / customer of the products, and would like to help the DV Info collective knowledge base) |
January 13th, 2014, 11:26 PM | #63 |
Inner Circle
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Wow, yet another lap.........
Michael: I keep seeing different system weights from you, so no model can be specifically pinpointed for a TESTER Vinten system. Whatever you currently have will have to be it, and let Andrew at Vinten specify the system. The sticks under the Vb(x) heads are all exactly the same, so it matters not. The reason for my last post, in case you haven't worked it out, is to establish a baseline for usability at the least possible cost to you and avoiding, if at all possible, the "buy it and weep" scenario so many people find themselves in. With the test Vinten and the Manfrotto 520ball, you can test not only the full Vinten, but the Vinten sticks with your existing head, then work out what, if anything gives you the best bang for your buck. This is based on my experience with both cheap/ expensive heads and cheap/ expensive sticks. 1.Cheap sticks under cheap heads = crap 2.Cheap sticks under good heads = not much better, but better 3.Good sticks under cheap heads = better than 2. 4.Good sticks under good heads = bliss Good luck getting the vendor to promise to take back (and refund) a purchased system is it doesn't suit, that's exactly what I'm trying to avoid here, and that's exactly where you go with either the Solo's or the Gitzos. As for reviews, they're only meaningful if they're relevant to your shooting circumstances, how the heck will you know unless you have a benchmark? However, if you want to know why, exactly, I'm pretty dubious of 1:1:1:? sticks, read post #199 (yep, 199!) of this, er, my thread http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/tripod-s...ootout-14.html (especially the pdf's therein) and check out the rigidity tests (cool graphs, huh?) of the tripods in question, the worst, from memory, were the Sachtler 2:1:1's. Based on that, I have little faith in straight 1's top to bottom. Richard: great thought, though to make any comparison meaningful I'd really need both a Gitzo and a Solo system to get a feel for a winner. The forensic tests I did for my shootout reviews won't even get a look in till I've got this damn new bionic knee functioning more like a knee and less like a toaster/ skateboard/ PITA. CS |
January 14th, 2014, 07:24 AM | #64 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Chris:
By 1:1:1 do you mean singe tube for each leg section? |
January 14th, 2014, 03:50 PM | #66 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Chris:
This is why you need to try the Gitzo Series 3 CF legs yourself, whether the Miller system is available or not. |
January 14th, 2014, 04:55 PM | #67 | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
I started wanting as light as possible, specifying that 4kg would be ideal, and expressing doubt that I would be able to get anything "good" at that weight.
As I have gained more data, thanks to you and other posters here, I have accepted that I may have to go slightly higher and have only gone as high as 4.85kg. Quote:
My only baseline for a good system is the very heavy Miller tripods and heads of 30+ years ago. These were very good. I often had 3 cameras (two 16mm and one video) mounted to the same head, tracking horse races from the other side of the track. One of the 16mm cameras and the video camera had an equivalent angle of view of about 1200mm. These were rock steady and smooth. I have not laid hands on anything even half decent since. I hoped (and still do) that modern materials and manufacturing have improved the weight/performance ratio. When I started this thread, I had completely discounted the possibility of using photo-style 1:1:1 sticks, but a couple of people have commented that some of them are quite good, all things considered. At the same time, my other research indicated that other people found this style a good compromise for difficult environments where spreader systems become restrictive. I've read many of your posts on this forum and noticed that you have been unable to test any of these stick. So this is the only area where my requirements have changed since the start of this thread. I hope to be able to come in under $2K, but this is not a hard limit. But it has to be worth it to me, since this is just a hobby for me I can't just make the cost back. Quote:
The bottom line is that between what I've learned here, and my discussion with the store in Brisbane (who, incidentally, didn't rave-up the Miller or Sachtler at this weight level, so I felt he was being honest), I've come to the conclusion that the Gitzo/Sachtler or Miller systems will be the best compromise for me. I'm not expecting perfection (and never was), but I am hoping for significant gains on what I've been using. I don't have a direct comparison between these 2 systems, but everything I've read leads me to believe that there isn't a massive difference between them, not enough to justify a $900 difference in price. I will hold off until the end of the month before purchasing, partly because my wife has just had knee surgery and if that hasn't fixed her knee, then my rainforest trekking days will be numbered. |
||
January 14th, 2014, 04:58 PM | #68 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Quote:
|
|
January 15th, 2014, 10:19 PM | #69 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Lots of activity.... Zero progress....
|
January 15th, 2014, 10:33 PM | #70 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 215
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Really?
After posting yesterday I discovered that the total weight quoted for the Miller systems includes the bag and strap, so it does come out exactly at my ideal 4kg. This also brings a system based on the Compass 12 head within the realm of possibility at 4.8kg, and that does look like a much better head. Both Alister Chapman and Philip Bloom seem to like them in this class. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/785054-REG/Miller_1870_Solo_DV_2_Stage_Carbon.html Although the weight is stated as 6.7kg, the legs and head come to 4.8kg. I'm waiting for Miller to get back to me at the moment to make sure that is correct. |
January 16th, 2014, 12:05 AM | #71 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Sorry.
It is truly a shame you can't compare systems in person. Good luck with your purchase. |
January 16th, 2014, 08:28 PM | #72 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rossland, British Columbia
Posts: 1,024
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Michael,
Sorry I haven't been able to offer any help in the last little while. I have been in Melbourne visiting my daughter & grandson with no internet. If you can possibly stretch your weight limits to accommodate the Miller compass 12 head, that would be the way I would go. As I have said in a previous post, the problem with the DV10 head is that the head has a very limited adjustment in both counterbalance, & drag. The Compass 12 fixes that, & from what I have read, fixes it well. I have both the Miller CF legs & the Gitzo, & I think you would be happy with either. Of course, I could say the same about the Sachtler head. I think you are of the right mind when you talk about having to make a compromise with this setup. Without a personal Sherpa to carry your gear, the perfect solution would be back breaking. Regards, Bryce
__________________
There's never enough hours in the day! |
January 16th, 2014, 09:59 PM | #73 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 351
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Bryce:
Are your Gitzo legs System 2 (GT2 something) or System 3 (GT3 something)? |
January 17th, 2014, 04:32 PM | #74 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rossland, British Columbia
Posts: 1,024
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
They're system 3 legs with a 100mm bowl. The leg sections are approximately 1 1/2" in diameter at the top. (That's just a guess though, as I don't have them near me at the moment)
__________________
There's never enough hours in the day! |
January 17th, 2014, 10:37 PM | #75 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Whidbey Island
Posts: 873
|
Re: Good Lightweight Tripod System
Bryce,
I think you have Series 5 Carbon 100mm bowl model! I have Series 3 and just took a leg measurement at the top section. Only 30mm (1.25 inches). I remember you posting about them about a year and a half ago. I'm betting they're either model GT5532LS or GT5532S. If you go to the Gitzo site, you will find these under the "Photography" section and not in the "Video" section. I really like the FSB-6/Gitzo leg combination. Yes, it's a compromise, isn't everything? Lighter weight gear makes a difference if you have to hand carry it all day. If wind up is evident, I can minimize that by holding the pan rod a few seconds at the end of a panning shot. GT5532 | B&H Photo Video (While I have the calipers handy, my Series 2, model GT2542LS legs are 26mm at the top.) Mark |
| ||||||
|
|