April 22nd, 2011, 02:57 AM | #16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,569
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
Of course, I missed the subject of "better than Manfrotto", and then I linked to a Manfrotto for sale! Doh!
Still, the 503HDV should be a step up. |
April 22nd, 2011, 04:53 PM | #17 | |
Inner Circle
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
Not really a lot else you could do. The thread started with Ben believeing that the issue was a head problem, but the balance of probability was that it is a system problem, owing to the likely sticks packaged with that head (sticks still unidentified, strangely).
With the tight budget then stretched to a complete system, the room for manouvre came down to pretty well zero. Much as I dislike recommending incremental suport upgrades, because it's so wastefull of cash amongst other things, in this instance I couldn't do any better either. Quote:
CS |
|
April 22nd, 2011, 07:54 PM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,290
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
I rented a 504, it's in a completely different league than the 501/701/503 series. Seems pretty good, but I'm not as discriminating as Chris or some of the others. Thing about the 504, is that once you strap on the legs, aren't you into Vinten/Sachtler price category?
|
April 23rd, 2011, 12:37 AM | #19 |
Inner Circle
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
Ah, well, sort of.................
If you check out the component prices of both the Manfrotto and Libec systems (504HD head/ 546B sticks; RH 25 head/ RT 30B sticks) you notice something interesting. The 504 head is only about 20 - 30 bucks more than a 503HDV, which gives you a pretty good guide as to what it cost in design and tooling to produce, but those 546B sticks are pretty expensive by comparison (and they're damn good sticks too, shame about the spreader). With Libec, it's the other way 'round. The sticks are comparatively cheap (they really did pare them down to the bone, and it shows) whilst the head cost them a bomb, hence it's very expensive. So, you end up with a very similar package price for both systems, neither of which, as a whole, are that stellar (any system is only as good as it's weakest link, sort of thing) and their package price is somewhere South of the Vinten VB by about 3 - 4 hundred bucks. Where Vinten totally blind sided both of them was in using the Vision 6 head, long in production and all R&D & tooling costs recouped, simply re - badged and liveried and a new spring. Mate it with a standard pro production set of Vinten sticks (and they make VERY good sticks) and practically give away the head (it doesn't owe them much) and you have a killer system at a price that 10 years ago would have been inconcievable. Going for anything other than the Vinten in that weight/ COG class is sheer financial/ operational lunacy IMHO. And just to totally enrage those swearing about the 504's supposedly wonderfull handling characteristics, why not take a free VB test drive, then come back and say the 504 is somehow in the same league. I've had them both here side by side, and there is no way on the planet there is any similarity. The 504 is a total dog by comparison (sorry Manfrotto, missed again, great sticks, mind!). I know this always comes across as biased, and in a way, it is. I expect any tool I buy to do what it was bought to do, when I want, how I want and not to make me change how I do things because of it's limitations (and anything failing in that task goes straight in the bin). The Vintens do that, no drama, no exceptions, no baulking. Everything else is just "This is what I can do, take it or leave it". Well, I'll leave it, thanks, but no thanks. [Ooh, was that a rant? Didn't feel like a rant. nah, just me being me I guess. Mention of Manfrotto 504's may have something to do with it, better get that review of same up, been particularly slack with it]. Just feel the need to impart information, can't help myself. CS |
April 25th, 2011, 07:23 PM | #20 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,005
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
The reality is most people don't do high end work. It makes sense to pair equipment that's in an appropriate proportion to the other equipment and the amount you are getting paid. I can only speak for myself but 504 is quality enough for the work I do and matches my budget. Btw, I use it with a Z1.
Why not get the best camera, microphone, wireless system, mixer, sticks, head, editing software, lights, monitor, computer... No one is saying that 504 is better or the same as Vinten but Vinten isn't 3-4x better because that's the price difference. I've used semi-pro heads like the 501 that claim to be fluid but are utter crap. |
April 25th, 2011, 07:53 PM | #21 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,609
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
Pete, I agree. I've said time after time you get the best you can afford for the type of work you are doing and for some thats Manfrotto 501. I've used Cartoni heads and legs that are cost enough to be able to buy a nice car or use as a downpayment on a house and trust me they make the other stuff out there look pretty bad BUT for the LIVE TV work I was doing (using remote cameras as much as 1/4 mile from the placement on the track to track cars at 200MPH ) that's what was needed. For weddings, seminars, talking heads, even most TV commericals as sports like high school or JR college football, the 501/503/504/516 heads on the 3246 or 515/525 legs worked just fine for me.
You get what you need, what you can afford and if it doesn't do the job you want then you get something else. Like I've said before, if you know the limitations of any piece of gear and can work within them, great. If you can't then you need to get something else.
__________________
What do I know? I'm just a video-O-grafer. Don |
April 26th, 2011, 08:51 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,005
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
I think Manfrotto gets a bad wrap because they sell wide range of heads. Either through Manfrotto's misrepresentation of low end heads or beginners ignorance, they get a bad reputation. For example, I remember Manfrotto using fluid to describe the 501 head when its really friction.
Don, you make a good point about the type of work will dictate the type of head you're going to need. If you're shooting live action from over 50 ft away, nothing but a quality fluid head will do a proper job. For close up interviews a lower quality head will most likely fit the bill. Back to the OP, if you have the money ($1,000-$1,800) and want to get a pro head you won't be disappointed and its not a terrible investment but imhop it's a little out of proportion to the camera you are using. |
April 26th, 2011, 09:15 PM | #23 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
Ben, take a look at the Sachtler FSB-4. It's right sized for the Z1 and can be either a bowl or flat top so you uare future proofed with whatever legs you have now and in the future. The Vinten Blue isn't. Of course if you want to buy English, then Vinten and Libec are your brands. I have Sacthler FSB-4 and Cartoni Focus heads and love them.
|
April 26th, 2011, 11:23 PM | #24 | ||
Inner Circle
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
Ben took a dive a couple of days ago, we're talking to ourselves now Quote:
No camera support currently manufactured is "future proof" in any way, shape or form. It is only a question of time before mechanical supports will give way to electronic interfaces which allow the OIS systems to know what the "support" is trying to do, thus obviating the need for precision mechanical engineering. Quote:
So, not to harp on, but what has been quietly glossed over here is that elephant in the studio corner called ...........HD! Many supports that were, and are, perfectly suitable for shooting SD (I myself used a Manfrotto 503/ 520 rig for many years) just simply won't cut it for HD. If you're shooting for SD with a HD camera, fine, it probably won't show. Try shooting for HD with a SD only rated support. I can tell you from bitter (and expensive) experience, it simply cannot be done and it will negate all and any skill you may have with your rig. Just about anyone asking support questions on this Forum has bought into HD at one level or another (not really much choice now) so why on earth would I point them deliberately to a rig that can't shoot HD for HD (IMHO)? I can't and won't. As for "the type of work dictating the quality of head" to seriously paraphrase some responses, they (the head and sticks) are either capable of shooting HD for HD, or they ain't (again, IMHO). If you're shooting HD for HD, the camera dictates the standard of support, not the "type of work" because it's all HD for HD and any old rubbish simply won't cut it. All, of course, IMHO, but then again, maybe I missed something in the last 20 odd years and am talking through my hat. And with that, I think this thread may well have passed it's use by date. CS |
||
April 27th, 2011, 09:52 AM | #25 | |||
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,014
|
Re: Advide on upgrading tripod head - something better than manfrotto
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Disagree. Others come along and do searches of DVinfo and will find this discussion and maybe benefit from it. This information persistence a fundamental value prop of the internet. Specifically, they'll now read about the flexibility of some heads to work in both bowl and flat top environments. Also, they'll recognize your name, your entertaining posts and the predictable recommendation of Vinten Blue occasionally followed by my opinion saying how nice Sachtler and Cartoni brands are based on my ownership and use. |
|||
| ||||||
|
|