June 3rd, 2005, 08:40 AM | #1 |
Tourist
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
|
Black vs. Chrome tripod legs?
I know this may be random but I'll be investing in a nice new pair of sticks (tripod). From your experience which holds up better cosmetically...black or chrome tripod legs. I know with wear and tear and all that, they can get damaged. Oh and which do you think looks better? Thanks for your short replies.
Mike |
June 3rd, 2005, 08:56 AM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I have 3 tripods that are all black - a Manfrotto 3221WN/501, a Miller DS-5 and a smaller Manfrotto 719B for my still camera. After lots of trekking around will all of these, the black finish is holding up fine.
Personally, I think black looks far better and calls less attention to you. But if you find a fantastic deal on a silver tripod it might be worth considering. |
June 3rd, 2005, 08:58 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 496
|
Black looks better, but polished aluminum holds up better. Go with carbon fiber if you can afford it(best of both worlds).
John |
June 3rd, 2005, 09:02 AM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
I have 3 tripods that are all black - a Manfrotto 3221WN/501, a Miller DS-5 and a smaller Manfrotto 719B for my still camera. After lots of trekking around will all of these, the black finish is holding up fine.
Personally, I think black looks far better and calls less attention to you. But if you find a fantastic deal on a silver tripod it might be worth considering. |
| ||||||
|
|