|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 8th, 2011, 04:32 PM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Apple Valley CA
Posts: 4,874
|
FWIW, the laws are already strict, but the cost of enforcement is pretty substantial, with little chance of meaningful recovery... sadly you can't "make" people respect the property rights of others, and the digital revolution makes it that much simpler to have your "property" violated.
|
January 8th, 2011, 05:45 PM | #17 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Thank you for all the helpful information.
Last edited by Paul Cronin; January 9th, 2011 at 01:33 AM. Reason: Too long winded |
January 8th, 2011, 05:55 PM | #18 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miami Beach, FL
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
|
|
January 9th, 2011, 12:25 AM | #19 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,531
|
Copyright laws don't need changing as they are quite clear. The ultra-litigious lawyers employed by Getty Images are already persecuting plenty of little people for mostly inadvertent use of images they don't have the rights to use. I think that the message will get out there eventually.
|
| ||||||
|
|