This one cost only 300 dollars! at DVinfo.net

Dimitris Mantalias · December 20th, 2009, 09:16 AM

I find it so hard to believe, but it seems it's true. This short 5-min film cost only 300 dollarsv and as I hear, the creator is now working for the big names. Ok, there is talent, but... 300 dollars? Unbelievable!

YouTube - Ataque de Pánico! (Panic Attack!) 2009

Marty Welk · December 20th, 2009, 04:07 PM

that is cool $300 bucks, if anyone knows where i can get a legitimate copy of even some editing software that works for $300 please do tell.
i heard that Windows movie maker wont do that kind of stuff :-)

Brian Drysdale · December 22nd, 2009, 03:56 AM

That's what a friend of mine who edits Dr Who said.

I guess it would depend on what he's counting as his production costs, but it's not a "real" figure if he's actually not including or factoring in the cost of the software, unless he works for a post house and then again it's not a realistic figure, only that he personally was out of pocket $300.

Scott Brickert · February 12th, 2010, 10:17 PM

Pro'lly he meant $300 per finished second...

Cole Seidl · February 16th, 2010, 10:06 AM

He said on some blog that he spent $300 physically shooting the live action. Then, after the initial $300 he spent over a year dealing with the editing and visual effects. So the $300 is only initial shooting costs.

December 20th, 2009, 09:16 AM	#1
Dimitris Mantalias Major Player Join Date: May 2009 Location: Arta, Greece Posts: 342	This one cost only 300 dollars! I find it so hard to believe, but it seems it's true. This short 5-min film cost only 300 dollarsv and as I hear, the creator is now working for the big names. Ok, there is talent, but... 300 dollars? Unbelievable! YouTube - Ataque de Pánico! (Panic Attack!) 2009 __________________ "A successful wedding videographer is the one that offers for viewing some excellent videos and some boring videos, and gets positive reviews for both".

December 20th, 2009, 04:07 PM	#2
Marty Welk Major Player Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: East Bay Cali Posts: 563	that is cool $300 bucks, if anyone knows where i can get a legitimate copy of even some editing software that works for $300 please do tell. i heard that Windows movie maker wont do that kind of stuff :-) __________________ ----------------sig----------------- Re-learning everything all over again, one more time.

February 12th, 2010, 10:17 PM	#4
Scott Brickert Major Player Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Crested Butte, CO Posts: 576	Pro'lly he meant $300 per finished second... __________________ Scott Shot-By-Scott

December 22nd, 2009, 03:56 AM	#3
Brian Drysdale Inner Circle Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Belfast, UK Posts: 6,152	That's what a friend of mine who edits Dr Who said. I guess it would depend on what he's counting as his production costs, but it's not a "real" figure if he's actually not including or factoring in the cost of the software, unless he works for a post house and then again it's not a realistic figure, only that he personally was out of pocket $300.

February 16th, 2010, 10:06 AM	#5
Cole Seidl Regular Crew Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Minneapolis, MN Posts: 126	He said on some blog that he spent $300 physically shooting the live action. Then, after the initial $300 he spent over a year dealing with the editing and visual effects. So the $300 is only initial shooting costs.