|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 19th, 2006, 09:55 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 505
|
Using digital blurring instead of an M2, Brevis etc.
Has anyone used a program like combustion to create background blur (to help focus the viewers attention on the foreground) instead of using a 35mm adapter such as an M2 or Brevis.
|
December 19th, 2006, 06:33 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 93
|
To do it right you really need to do a lot of rotoscoping. But there's a tutorial to do this online with After Effects:
http://www.creativecow.net/articles/...pthoffield.htm
__________________
To live a creative life, we must first lose our fear of being wrong. - Joseph Chilton Pearce |
December 19th, 2006, 07:20 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
You could also do it in layers with a bluescreen.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
December 19th, 2006, 07:41 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 505
|
Paul, Jon, thanks - that's an interesting tutorial - the combustion 4 package comes with a similar demo, but using multiple gradient masks to mark depth within a scene. I thought it would be a cool alternative to shooting with M2's and the like, but it's a lot of effort to go to, maybe worthwhile on key scenes.
|
December 20th, 2006, 05:26 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 37
|
Jon,
How can you use this method on a Vegas 7.0 platform? |
December 20th, 2006, 05:41 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 221
|
duplicate your track. on the upper one, mask out your subject frame by frame (rotoscoping). Then apply a slight Gaussian blur to the underlying video track. This doesn't work where the focus needs to become progressively off, however. If you take time, it works and works well... if you take time.
|
December 20th, 2006, 11:13 PM | #7 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Camas, WA, USA
Posts: 5,513
|
Quote:
This doesn't give you smooth progressive focus, but it works well if there is a large distance between foreground and background. And no hand tweaking or rotoscoping is required.
__________________
Jon Fairhurst |
|
January 6th, 2007, 07:01 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 259
|
I've successfully tried it by using keying tools and rotoscoping in AE, BUT it is a PAIN and VERY time consuming! And it becomes much harder and poorer quality if there is no really good color or luma separation between the foreground and background. Plus, you don't get the natural gradient in the focus as you do in a natural shot with shallow DOF. It worked for me because I was simply trying to separate people from a deep background that was essentially a vertical plane behind them. If you can do it on a green screen you should not have too much trouble, but trying to work with raw single layer footage is the hard way to go. I wish I would have used a 35mm adapter, even though they have other issues.
__________________
MW |
| ||||||
|
|