|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 13th, 2006, 11:20 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 424
|
Here is your film look
Here is your coveted film look. Mixture of After Effects DOF Simulation, image softening, and my own 24p method. Shot 60i with a Sony VX2000.
:-) Comments and criticisms appreciated. www.rileyharmon.com/temp/pan61.mov |
June 14th, 2006, 12:29 AM | #2 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
Quote:
Should you care? I wouldn't really care too much... although it's fixable with lighting (use a net) or other methods. The footage looks great. 2- I'm ignoring the red bars... did the encode screw up there? |
|
June 14th, 2006, 07:02 AM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,961
|
I think it looks good. The shirt detail only highlights a bit on one side. All the fabric shadows from folds and the collar are still fine. I am especially impressed since I have a VX2000 and that doesn't look at all like the camera's natural footage. How does AE give a shallow DOF effect?
|
June 14th, 2006, 09:30 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 424
|
encoder didnt mess up, i purposly put red bars. its a promotional video for my college. so im using our colors! O----ooooooU!
|
June 15th, 2006, 04:04 PM | #5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
It looks like video. Work more on imaging softening and levels...
__________________
Juan Parra |
|
June 19th, 2006, 02:33 PM | #6 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 15
|
I don't get it...
it doesn't look like it came from film at all... |
June 19th, 2006, 03:33 PM | #7 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
rgb |
|
June 19th, 2006, 06:41 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 424
|
better shots coming, i was mainly displaying the dof and 24p, which dont account for all of film look
|
June 20th, 2006, 10:42 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 101
|
according to the description of this forum 24p does stand as "film look"
"Frame Movie mode, 24p and other approaches to a cinematic feel." i like the video, i think its well done. i do a very similar artificial shallow dof on some of my photos in photoshop.
__________________
(Wishes to be more informative and helpful than a nuisance) |
June 20th, 2006, 11:16 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 424
|
|
June 21st, 2006, 05:46 AM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 223
|
Riley that last one was superb. Nice.
|
June 21st, 2006, 10:07 AM | #12 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
although the 24p looks jerky at times... i bet de-interlacing the 60i clip, and then encoding it at 15fps will have a better filmlook...at least the jerkiness won't be a distraction...
__________________
Juan Parra |
|
June 23rd, 2006, 03:07 PM | #13 |
Jubal 28
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 872
|
I'm not sure there's enough going on in that clip to really judge. It doesn't look like harsh Sony 60i, but there's not enough motion to really appreciate the 24p cadence.
__________________
www.wrightsvillebeachstudios.com |
July 2nd, 2006, 01:07 PM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Welland ON
Posts: 515
|
Riley, that sky replacement was sick!
__________________
"We've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty." |
July 2nd, 2006, 02:24 PM | #15 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
I didn't watch the video, but I wish poeple would stop obsessing over blown out highlights. I can name numerous 35mm films with blown out highlights, and you know what? They were blown out on purpose, for artistic reasons.
So IMHO anyone who critcises 'filmlook' by the fact that there may be blown out highlights is talking, well, I'll let you insert a word or phrase there. |
| ||||||
|
|