|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 9th, 2005, 02:34 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Whitman, Massachusetts
Posts: 168
|
Preparing a film production
All right everyone, I have another question. When preparing an independent film production, what is the best business layout?
I know that you should open a new LLC for every film you produce. The thing I'm wondering is, how is it that companies such as View Askew, Happy-Madison, and Cappra produce film after film under the same name? Do they open a new LLC for each film and just keep the same name? Or, do they form an initial production company to work under at all times, and then form new companies for each production; so that in effect, there would be two companies working on the same production . . . is that clear enough? Anyway, could someone clarify this for me. |
November 9th, 2005, 06:00 PM | #2 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 108
|
A Limited Liability Corp. (LLC) is just as it sounds. It reduces the productions "liability" in the event of something bad happening. An example would be a stunt or fx shot going awry with horrible results. The idea of an LLC is to protect the parent corp. So when a studio like Fox shoots a tv series such as the X-files in Canada they do so under the protection of their LLC. Of course this is just a vague desricption of one of many possible scenarios. So to answer your question best, I would say YES, you should form a new LLC for every production you and/or your company undertakes. For your protection as well as investors and such.
Jipsi K. |
November 9th, 2005, 11:50 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Whitman, Massachusetts
Posts: 168
|
Thanks for the reply, but I'm already quite familiar with what an LLC actually is. What I'm wondering is . . . if I were to start a production company today (theoretically), and wanted to shoot a film starting immedietly, would I have to open TWO businesses? One for the production company, one for the film?
|
November 10th, 2005, 12:24 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hollywood, California
Posts: 899
|
Quote:
|
|
November 10th, 2005, 07:22 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Venice, FL
Posts: 850
|
It depends on your funding. If you are bringing in different partners or investors for each production, then it should be it's own company, even if that company hires your production company to produce the film. Clear?
__________________
You are either growing or dying. |
November 10th, 2005, 07:33 AM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 704
|
Quote:
It's a very common practice actually. To answer the original post, yes, I think you would set up 2 companies. Best to talk to a lawyer about these things, obviously, but I think Bob outlined it well. The first company would hire the second. Or, I know some people who finish the film and then sell it to their parent company. Either way can work.
__________________
Luis Caffesse Pitch Productions Austin, Texas |
|
November 10th, 2005, 02:02 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Whitman, Massachusetts
Posts: 168
|
Thank you for the information. That's exactly what I was trying to figure out.
|
November 13th, 2005, 11:54 PM | #8 |
MPS Digital Studios
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
Posts: 8,531
|
My company, MPS digital studios, inc., is a legal company. Every time I make a feature film, starting next year, a seperate company (whether it's an LLC or an s-corp) will be formed to produce each film. If there's a sequel, the same company will do so. Key thing is, you want investors in the film, not your main company. Talk to a lawyer, though.
My favorite production company name was Big Bug Pictures, which produced Starship Troopers for Sony and Disney in 1996. heath
__________________
My Final Cut Pro X blog |
| ||||||
|
|