Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird? - Page 20 at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Techniques for Independent Production
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Techniques for Independent Production
The challenges of creating Digital Cinema and other narrative forms.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 8th, 2020, 04:18 PM   #286
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lowestoft - UK
Posts: 4,044
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

You don't invest, you hire. I've got a store full of one job wonders where items never got used twice. It's nice to have gear, but usually a waste of money.

I have a question - I have never heard the term you use frequently Ryan. Motivated and un-motivated movement. I've tried to work it out, but have failed? What is it? Probably make myself look foolish here, but I don't understand it when you use it?
Paul R Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 04:28 PM   #287
also known as Ryan Wray
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Saskatoon, Canada
Posts: 2,888
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

Yeah I could hire it's just I find myself having to do things on my own, especially for these projects where they want to hire a one man band, but I still want to do the best job possible for myself.

It was a term we often used in the film school course I took, unless I have it wrong. Basically motivated camera movement, is when the camera is moving along with an actor who is moving, and the camera is just tracking the actor... where as unmotivated, the camera is moving but not according to the actors movements, if that makes sense?
Ryan Elder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 04:43 PM   #288
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belfast, UK
Posts: 6,152
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

What you can do on your own is mostly limited to what you can carry and the number of journeys you want to make back and forth from the car carrying it. How much you can do visually and with the audio depends on your skills and the time you have available.
Brian Drysdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 05:13 PM   #289
also known as Ryan Wray
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Saskatoon, Canada
Posts: 2,888
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

Yeah true. I guess for projects where I have crew to help, I can plan out all the shots where I want a gimbal, since I already know I want some, and then when it comes to ones where I need a dolly, I will see if I do at the time, or I could just scrap the dolly shots alltogether and just have the gimbal shots only perhaps.
Ryan Elder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 05:48 PM   #290
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belfast, UK
Posts: 6,152
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

You seem to be obsessed by Gimbals, it's like comparing apples with oranges. Large productions use the dolly a lot of the time, because you can set up shots easier with the dolly than using the tripod, but that doesn't mean you don't have a tripod in the camera truck.
Brian Drysdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 05:55 PM   #291
also known as Ryan Wray
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Saskatoon, Canada
Posts: 2,888
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

Oh okay well it's just I know for sure I will need a gimbal for a good amount of the shots, but I do not know what I will need for others.

That is why I ask how do you know what types of shots require what types of equipment. Especially since I see gimbals in videos going back and forth and up and down, and thinking, if these are dolly and jib shots, than why are they using a gimbal for them...

But I know for sure I will need the gimbal for some. When you think of a shot in your head though, how do you figure out what piece of equipment is proper to move it with?

Perhaps some will be dolly shots. But when it comes to lenses with a gimbal, how long can the lenses go before it becomes a problem? Can you go up to 35mm for example?
Ryan Elder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 06:44 PM   #292
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,005
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

Get some sort of job and use the money to buy a gimbal like the Crane 2. They don’t cost a lot and are very versatile tools for low budget stuff you’re doing. In the process you’ll be able to answer your own questions.

Otherwise we seem to be getting no where, you’re asking the same questions we’ve already answered.
Pete Cofrancesco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 06:47 PM   #293
also known as Ryan Wray
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Saskatoon, Canada
Posts: 2,888
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

Okay sure, sorry, there are some variables I wanted to go over. In my research it seems the Moza Air 2 seems like the best one for a lower price, so I might get it later. It's just whenever I buy a new piece of equipment it turns out to have hidden catches in it that I wish I caught before I bought it. Like a lens turning out to be fly-by-wire example, Iike before. So I want to eliminate all hidden catches before buying the equipment, cause then you know what you want.
Ryan Elder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 07:06 PM   #294
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,005
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

Moza air is also a good choice. You have to accept it’s just a stepping stone. In a couple years your needs will have changed or you’ll want something better, it will have served its purpose, sell it get something else. Same thing for the lens. You start out with cheaper gear and once your skills and needs warrants it you move on. All gear has flaws or limitations nothing is perfect, treat them as learning opportunities and means to achieve your current goals and projects.
Pete Cofrancesco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 07:16 PM   #295
also known as Ryan Wray
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Saskatoon, Canada
Posts: 2,888
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

Yeah I guess. My sound gear has lasted a lot longer over the years, than the video gear. So I thought maybe I was doing something wrong when making decision on video gear, compared to audio. But I was thinking I would only buy the gimbal if I was doing the project that I want for it. So if the project is a go, I wanted to know ahead of time what to buy, so it's ready to go, rather than just buying it and figuring out if it's right for the project. But when it comes to deciding whether or not to buy a gimbal how wide does a lens have to be for the gimbal to work well? Can I get away with 35mm?

Or, what if I got the pro-aim tripod dolly along with pro-aim flex track. Has anyone ever used these and know from experience about how well they work?

Last edited by Ryan Elder; January 8th, 2020 at 08:43 PM.
Ryan Elder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2020, 10:58 PM   #296
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 1,254
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

The choices here are between the (1) Gimbal, (2) Flextrack, (3) do both, or (4) do nothing. Gotta have the “do nothing” in the decision tree.

With regard to #2, the Flextrack, that is an option you are lusting after. I can feel it. However, lets look at the plus and minus aspects:
1. Cost: a lot
2. Storage: will take up a lot of room, and … transport. Need a roomy vehicle.
3. Ease of use: Not.
4. Time to set up: Takes a lot of time
5. Shots were it can be used in a cost-effective manner: limited
6. Maintenance: it will get dirty so need to clean before transporting or storing in the house/garage.
7. Labor: requires another operator

Option #1
1. Cost: the least expensive
2. Storage: no problem
3. Ease of use: Powered gimbal is quite easy
4. Time to set up: minimal
5. Shots where it can be used: Lots
6. Maintenance: have to charge batteries
7. Labor: One-man show

Option #3
1. Cost: The gimbal will pay for the Flextrack

Option #4
1. Cost: a lot because you didn’t get the gigs you could have because you didn’t get the gimbal
2. Storage: no problem because without the gigs you can’t buy more kit

Can’t take it anymore … you need to be the go-to guy for video in Saskatoon so go order the gimbal. Nothing is perfect and it won’t be a deal-breaker even though it might not be able to do everything you want. Not to worry, it will do a lot. It is money well spent and you won’t regret it. More kit is your friend.

Glad I could help!

Next thread: Lighting

P.S. Note to Charles: I really liked your Steadycam videos! Fantastic!

Edit: Note to Ryan - when is this gig? Order the gimbal now so you can practice with it before the shoot.
Picture of my gimbal with the X3000 and it has an optically stabilized lens. The primary purpose of the gimbal is to maintain a level horizon but it has other useful capabilities. The black & white cable is a flexible audio cable to record audio out to the Tascam DR44WL recorder. The gimbal, cam, and recorder can be controlled by an iPhone via apps.
Attached Thumbnails
Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?-img_8187.jpg  

Last edited by John Nantz; January 8th, 2020 at 11:11 PM. Reason: To add comment and photo
John Nantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2020, 01:42 AM   #297
also known as Ryan Wray
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Saskatoon, Canada
Posts: 2,888
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

Okay thanks, good point you made about dirt. I only used a dolly and track once. Not a flex track, a flat one, but I found that the dolly vibrated on the track a lot. I think it was cause of the ground underneath, which was a parking lot ground.

I can get the gimbal sooner and practice with it. One of the gigs is the martial arts one, which I may use a gimbal on, depending. The other is a horror thriller, where I can think of gimbal shots I would want, during the suspense and action scenes more.

For option 3, when you say the gimbal will pay for the flex track, are you saying getting a gimbal, gets you more gigs, if you have one? And I could get the gimbal, I just wonder if maybe for future projects after this martial arts one, maybe I should stick to directing and have a separate gimbal operator perhaps.
Ryan Elder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2020, 02:31 AM   #298
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Belfast, UK
Posts: 6,152
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

Regarding the track, it sounds like you didn't use the wedges etc to level the metal track and ensure that it all was in direct contact with the ground. A parking lot surface probably isn't level, so may have small variations, which will cause the track to flex slightly. as the dolly is pushed over it.

Regarding dollys, one of the best paying pieces of kit I bought was a Doorway Dolly, With pneumatic wheels it's surprisingly good over a range of surfaces, if needed, track and track wheels could be hired in, which was done for a number of shorts. However, you do need another person to operate, so you're into another ball game than one man crewing.

It also was also handy for moving kit and lights into and around the location (handy in large supermarkets).

You can hire in dolly on a project by project basis. If you;re doing dramas, gimbals and dollys are apples and oranges, so it's a matter of selecting which is appropriate for each shot.

A gimbal on it's own won't get you gigs, it's the other aspects of you as a film maker that gets you gigs, that may be because you're very cheap or it may because you;re a people person or you've got a good sales patter or you've got all the connections or you're an extremely good at making the type of videos that are in demand in your area.
Brian Drysdale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2020, 03:34 AM   #299
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lowestoft - UK
Posts: 4,044
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

I read this, turned to the pile of gear that travelled with me to Belfast and discovered in one box is a gimbal. Been used just once since I bought it 2 years ago. The tripod is old, battered and the most useful piece of camera gear I own. I have two more tripods at home - one shorter, one longer, a jib and a pedestal. All those bought for specific projects. The most pointless and money wasting were the jib - bought in I think 1980 for a lot of money, and the pedestal - bought new in 2004 for around two and a half grand with the head. Jib is perhaps maybe ten projects in total, the pedestal three. The Vinten tripod in that tube has too many to even guess. I suspect that in 15 years the purchase cost of the jib is not yet covered and same with the ped. I should have hired. What we do is supposed to make money, yet I've wasted loads. This has been a long job, so I brought everything I knew I'd use - the gimbal was in one of the boxes, but no use to me here.

I'm really surprised by your problems with dolly work. I've no idea what you were doing, but even with poorly supported track, smoothness is rarely a problem, just that the camera heigh and horizontals shift. I'm always the kind of person who despite having longer zooms, usually moves closer. We're opposites here. I prefer the look of wider angles. The idea of going further away and going narrower creates more problems than it solves. Moving closer and wider minimises camera movement errors. Some of the bigger hand held gimbals can manage longer lenses and heavier payloads but often, the operator can't. The movements you get are not gimbal issues but the person holding the gimbal who cannot keep the thing at a constant height. I think you believe they are a godsend device, able to get you out of trouble, but they're just a tool - and often an ineffective one. They're cheap enough to buy. Are they the correct tool? I don't know. I just got mine out and tried it. Clearly the lack of use means I have to practice a great deal to get good results. I think you possibly flit from gizmo to gizmo with no time spent mastering anything before moving on. Maybe some time getting familiar with a really good tripod and head, possibly second hand if you MUST buy kit, would help. You could always use this on a base and track, or a rolling skid, or other conjured up devices. I KNOW I can't even think of steadicams because I've got a dodgy back. I'd love to think I could do it well, but I'm old enough to know when it's best to simplified the right person to do it for me. I'm not paying for gear hire, I'm paying for a solution. So many ways to get shots nowadays, so if it means hiring in a large jib so be it. Separate vision from the desire to be a one man band.
Attached Thumbnails
Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?-storagekit2.jpg  
Paul R Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2020, 07:13 AM   #300
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3,005
re: Would using a star filter for cinematography be too weird?

In previous threads Ryan has also received detailed equipment recommendations but he never buys anything because he doesn’t have the money or is unsure if it’s the right choice. There never seems to be any sort of resolution.

I only suggested the gimbal because it’s relatively inexpensive and an easy way to create motion if you have no other option.

While I agree specialized equipment can often sit and doesn’t get you work I just don’t see a point of endlessly playing what if with Ryan. If he ever got a gimbal, I could see him having problems operating it or complaining about the quality of motion or it’s inability to do what he wants.

As far as this karate movie/scene. If it’s another one of these no budget non paying projects then buying any sort of gear isn’t necessary unless you want to learn how to use it for future projects. Most likely all of this talk won’t lead any where.

Last edited by Pete Cofrancesco; January 9th, 2020 at 09:22 AM.
Pete Cofrancesco is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Special Interest Areas > Techniques for Independent Production


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network