|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 11th, 2005, 01:34 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 230
|
"film like" slow mo
|
September 11th, 2005, 08:04 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,195
|
Nice work!
How did you do it? Move very slow :-p? |
September 11th, 2005, 11:46 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 277
|
Looks great. No flicker or anything. What's the equipment/workflow?
|
September 11th, 2005, 12:43 PM | #4 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 23
|
Looks real good! Tell us the secret ;)
|
September 12th, 2005, 10:38 AM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 1,447
|
Gorgeous... okay, so we are waiting for the recipe.
|
September 12th, 2005, 01:04 PM | #6 |
New Boot
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 23
|
I like the way he does this. Posts a really nice clip, then leaves us in blissfull ignorance ;)
__________________
Carpe Noctem |
September 12th, 2005, 05:49 PM | #7 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
Gonna make myself vulnerable to foot-in-mouth disease here...
He probably shot 60i and converting that to 24p, each field taking up its own frame. 40% slowdown that way. After that, optical flow or similar technology/filter to slow things down further. Boris Optical Flow, latest version of Shake, revisionFX, etc. He could've used field blending... the resolution makes it hard to tell. EDIT: You know what? It only looks like he slowed things down 2-2.5X. He just moves slower after he starts... so because he moves in slow motion, it actually looks like it's in slow motion. To get 2-2.5X slowmo, you just need to do the 60i-->24p thing. EDIT2: If you look at the quicktime clip, it's 29.97fps without 3:2 pulldown. So the slowdown is probably just 50%. |
October 3rd, 2005, 11:22 AM | #8 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
|
|
October 10th, 2005, 10:02 AM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 89
|
Could you not just slow the speed of the clip down to 50%? I am curious to know how he did it too.
|
October 13th, 2005, 05:32 PM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Duluth GA
Posts: 238
|
Malon,
So are you going to tell us how you did your slow mo? |
October 13th, 2005, 05:35 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 106
|
with my DVX, I shoot 60i at 1/120 shutter speed. when I slow it down by 50% in a 24p timeline, it's smooooth slow-mo like his.
It has ot be 50%, or else it will become jumpy. |
October 18th, 2005, 09:19 AM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Duluth GA
Posts: 238
|
which editing software did you use?. Cuz I am sure other editing software might not act exactly the same way?
Also, can you please post a video clip or something so that we can see a sample or something? Preciate it man!. |
October 25th, 2005, 11:50 PM | #13 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Menifee, CA
Posts: 126
|
So you are pretty much just gonna leave everyone hanging?
__________________
Sony Fan Boy! Sony AX100, VG20, RX10, A6000, CX760 and a GoPro 4 |
October 26th, 2005, 11:40 AM | #14 |
Trustee
|
Heheh. Forget him, guys. I'll let you in.
Use MotionPerfect from GooderVideo. Don't let the cheesy low-budget-look website fool you. Their product is amazing. It calculates what the frames inbetween the existing ones should look like and fills in the gaps. You can get incredibly smooth slow motion using this program. Pssh. Secrets are no fun.
__________________
BenWinter.com |
October 26th, 2005, 12:59 PM | #15 |
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11
|
Thanks a lot Ben. Downloading the trial right away.
Hope this makes things simpler. Vigna Raajan. |
| ||||||
|
|