|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 18th, 2009, 04:52 AM | #16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Liability insurance aside... Shooting something, and having the right to use and distribute that image for your benifit are two different things depending on what you are shooting.
|
December 18th, 2009, 07:13 PM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kelowna, BC [Canada, Eh!]
Posts: 257
|
Quote:
|
|
December 22nd, 2009, 06:30 AM | #18 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
Why are you so reluctant to call the relevant agencies in the jurisdiction you want to work and simply ask them? The absolute worst thing that can happen is that they tell you what the rules are and you'll learn you need to go through more hassle or expense than you want - they're not going to trace your call and start shadowing you to make sure you don't pull out a camera without a permit. And even more important, why are you so reluctant to make sure you're following the legal straight and narrow path like the rest of the professional community does? You get no medals for circumventing the law and getting away with it. If you can't afford the fees to shoot in Miami, move your location to Fort Lauderdale. It's just as important for a filmaker to be a good citizen and obey the relevant laws as it is for any other sort of business.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
| ||||||
|
|