|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 11th, 2005, 01:20 PM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
Shooting three shorts
Even if I opened a thread at the PD150/170 forum over this matter, there might not be many people doing video to film projects there.
This Wednesday I will be shooting three 5-minute shorts on the same stage with the same people, using three PD cameras (two 170, one 150), that will be later blown up to 35mm. Even if I know the basics of this camera, like lowering resolution two or three points, there might be additional tips or advice someone might be providing. And I would be grateful for it. My idea is to "shoot for 1.85" instead of 1.33, to be hard-matted in editing or in the film transfer later on. Then if video copies are made from the 35mm version they will always be shown wide-screen. But in order not to lose resolution using the PD150/170 internal 16:9, I was thinking of shooting in plain 4:3. Am I right? During shooting I was planning to put a blocking tape over the LCD screen so everyone is framing within the 16:9 frame, as I don't think the PDs have 16:9 lines you can use, as apparently the GL2 does. Carlos |
April 11th, 2005, 05:11 PM | #2 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,750
|
You could talk to the facility where you want to get the blow-up done, as they will likely give you good tips and pointers. The conversion is going to cost thousands of dollars so it would be stupid not to ask them.
Quote:
Shooting progressive PAL will likely give you the highest quality from what I've read. This is compared to shooting interlaced/progressive NTSC (even 24p NTSC). Your area is PAL right? But anyways, I have zero experience with this. I suggest you phone up people who do. |
|
April 11th, 2005, 05:47 PM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Glenn Chan : You could talk to the facility where you want to get the blow-up done, as they will likely give you good tips and pointers. The conversion is going to cost thousands of dollars so it would be stupid not to ask them.
-->>> The transfer will cost me about $3,000/4,000 for the 15 minutes. And I will certainly talk with them. In any case I have already done that, that is talked with many transfer labs, and there's not much they say. I mean that I don't already know. <<<-- You should probably get anamorphic adapters to get the highest resolution for the film blowup. -->>> I forgot to say: that is not an option on this shooting. For many reasons, the main one being that I will be using three cameras. Another being that there are very few ana adaptors here. <<<-- Shooting progressive PAL will likely give you the highest quality from what I've read. This is compared to shooting interlaced/progressive NTSC (even 24p NTSC). Your area is PAL right? -->>> If we were a PAL country, which Brazil is not, I would be much less worried. The NTSC-to-24p step is not the best way to go through. In any case it will be a chance to see how far I can get going this path. Carlos |
April 13th, 2005, 05:11 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Posts: 1,138
|
In case someone wants it, I put my shooting guideline for the PD150 & 170 here:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...129#post300129 Carlos |
| ||||||
|
|