|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 21st, 2007, 10:08 AM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamden CT
Posts: 470
|
I think your idea would work easily if there was only one shooter/editor and 10 investors who received a share of the profits.
|
June 21st, 2007, 10:22 AM | #17 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
This is why a rental house is a much better way to go. They have the mechanisms in place (insurance, replacement gear, overnight shipping etc.) to cover these types of eventualities.
|
June 21st, 2007, 12:05 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 634
|
Quote:
This would seem to be the best solution frankly... I'm game...... Jon |
|
June 21st, 2007, 12:18 PM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,689
|
In my area we have a network of about 5-10 freelancers and we "share" gear with each other when possible. I rarely have to rent anything. We have a "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours policy" it is not always perfect but we have had very few issues. We figured last year that we saved in total over $30,000 in rentals.
ash =o) |
| ||||||
|
|