|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 15th, 2006, 06:00 AM | #16 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Quote:
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
|
February 15th, 2006, 12:26 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 107
|
are you reffering to the tapes?
they will probabely want the shots back in raw tpaed format. |
February 17th, 2006, 09:14 PM | #18 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 15
|
Not a lawyer, blah blah blah.
I've been a consultant for many years and have written more service contracts than I could count. In most situations, if you are paid by someone to do work for them (work for hire) they own the work. Typically you have to disclaim this if you don't want this to be the case. There are lots of variations (limited use licenses, license fees, etc.). Now, with that said, work for hire is typically hourly. If you were paid per project, you most likely only owe them what they asked you to produce, not the artifacts developed as part of the production process. If they paid you per hour, they could probably make a case for work for hire. See the "not a lawyer" disclaimer above... -Laudon |
| ||||||
|
|